On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Patrick Lists <fedora-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 11/17/2013 11:21 AM, Tim wrote: >> Allegedly, on or about 17 November 2013, Frantisek Hanzlik sent: >>> Binary logs, by contrast, may be useless when log file is damaged or I >>> haven't this one unique utility for reading them. And my experiences >>> with systems where binary logs are implemented says clearly that >>> binary logs is bad idea. >> >> And if logs are in a format that you cannot read, you cannot safely >> submit them to an outside server. You don't know what they contain. >> Logon credentials, confidential data that you're working on, etc. > > IIRC that's the reason why journald supports encryption. I don't recall > the link but there's a blog post somewhere (on redhat.com?) where the > reasons for moving to journald were outlined. Might be worth a search if > you want to know more.
syslog (using rsyslog) already supports encryption of you require that (even kerberos if that is what you want, we do). Journald is a solution in search of a problem ;-) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
