On 11/17/2013 11:21 AM, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 17 November 2013, Frantisek Hanzlik sent: >> Binary logs, by contrast, may be useless when log file is damaged or I >> haven't this one unique utility for reading them. And my experiences >> with systems where binary logs are implemented says clearly that >> binary logs is bad idea. > > And if logs are in a format that you cannot read, you cannot safely > submit them to an outside server. You don't know what they contain. > Logon credentials, confidential data that you're working on, etc.
IIRC that's the reason why journald supports encryption. I don't recall the link but there's a blog post somewhere (on redhat.com?) where the reasons for moving to journald were outlined. Might be worth a search if you want to know more. Regards, Patrick -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
