On 11.04.2013 20:45, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > Yes the Cisco router/Tomato combination works more predictably and the > logging works, something that DD-WRT never seemed to get right. So far > I've set up 4 rules and they seem to do what is expected. Time will tell > if I've got the right addresses controlled. > > Thanks to all for the help and encouragement,
dd-wrt do has its flies, true. :) Regarding a sockets, you can use: "netstat -a(ll) -n(umbers) -t(cp) -u(dp)…" or simply "less /proc/net/[ip_conntrack|nf_conntrack]" if a router provide it via cli(ssh). Web-GUI counterparts are "http://*router*/Status_Conntrack.asp";(dd-wrt) and probably "http://*router*/qos-detailed.asp";(tomato)". Bob, no problemos and good hunting on the "clouds". ;) poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
