On 03/06/13 17:20, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 06.03.2013 10:03, schrieb Ed Greshko: >> On 03/06/13 16:52, Gabriel VLASIU wrote: >>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> >>>> So you feel the -u parameter (access time) isn't sufficient to keep from >>>> deleting directories in use? >>> If the service did not access the private tmp directory in X day, yes. >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801943 >>> >> I see nothing in that bugzilla which states that a service has failed due to >> a directory in /var/tmp/systemd-private-* being deleted by the cron job >> while the file/directory was in use. > and THAT it what happens! > > if nothing is using the PrivateTmp which reflects /tmp > for the service all is fine and you would not need it > at all, if the service is using it you are f**ed
Shouldn't the -umc flag of tmpwatch prevent directories in use from being deleted? If you know of a service which doesn't access its related /var/tmp/systemd-private-* in 30 days and then subsequently fails when deleted by the tmpwatch cron job then please bugzilla it. -- From now on, at least during winter time, Im going to blame all spelling an grammar erros on the cat sitting on my chest every time I sit down at the computer....
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
