sometimes - rarely, but often enough - you only respond when there is sufficient noise On Aug 8, 2012 12:01 AM, "Tim" <ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 19:34 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote: > > To "c)", I must ask, how is a thread to get to get attention if, > > seemingly, everyone ignores it, when the answer is clearly - from my > > point of view - out here, yet no one will respond? My purpose in both > > cases was to get a wider audience and I succeeded. I may have caused > > some inconvenience between myself and the rest of this community, but > > I succeeded in drawing help to those who were asking where no one > > would have before. > > People *do* respond. Sometimes you/they don't have enough patience to > wait for it, don't expect instant responses. > > Other people noticing isn't actually helping the original poster, if > *they* don't notice. That's why you don't answer problems in a > different thread. > > -- > [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r > 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 > > Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I > read messages from the public lists. > > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org >
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
