Am 01.04.2012 16:53, schrieb jdow: > On 2012/04/01 07:42, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 15:56:01 -0500, >> Aaron Konstam <akons...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> To make ifconfig obsolete is really weird. It sounds to me that >>> developers of Fedora have to much time on their hands. Next I expect >>> they will change the name of vi. Oh, I forgot it is now vim. Where is Ed >>> Joy when we need him? [He was the creator of vi, in the very beginning.] >> >> ifconfig has been obsolete for a long time (in the sense that ip does >> more stuff, not in the packaging sense). > > Obsolete or not, I have macros built into my fingers that type out things > like "ifconfig eth0" when I am fishing for answers. Otherwise I hand edit > ifcfg-eth0 or its kith and kin. The GUI tool disappoints me when I try to > use it.
+1 999 out of 1000 cases dealing with networks can be done with ifconfig and classical network service and will hopefully be possible this way the next 20 years for static configured machines
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
