On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:58:31 -0800 Joe Zeff <j...@zeff.us> wrote: > On 01/23/2012 11:42 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > I always found the output of glxgears quite confusing, to say the least. If > > you think logically --- your screen displays a picture 60 times in one > > second, > > and some graphics cards (like Intel) render the frames in the same rythm, to > > display the images of the gears animation 60 times per second. > > Motion Pictures are shown at 32 fps and nobody complains about
32 ?? less than that. > flickering, but there are people who claim that anything less than 70 > fps on their monitor flickers. They are not comparable. One is a scanning line display the other is a continuous output beam. There are two big reasons that matters 1. The display behaviour is quite different, on a CRT all but one scan line of pixels is fading to black, on a film this isn't the case 2. Because it is scanning you have two frequencies - the update frequency and the animation frequency. You therefore get beat frequencies and images changing mid scan - aka "tearing". And if you want to know about the difference and whether it matters there is an astronomical amount of proper scientific peer reviewed literature on the subject. Alan -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
