Am 05.12.2011 10:56, schrieb Misha Shnurapet: >> SURELY! >> >> nobody forced the developers to throw all away and start from scratch >> if they decide to do so the should hol d back their crap until it is >> ready or learn what refactoring is and maintain the existing code > > No, they didn't have to keep the code to themselves.
not the code but a release called "GA" > That is Open Source, and that is how the software is developed and bug > reports gathered. well, but if the software is not ready for endusers it should not released to them as default UI > 3rd party developers have been provided with all the necessary tools and the > codebase > to create what users would further desire. does not help much if you release a software unusable for your current userbase but hey it supports a tablet > The project source code repository, the mailing lists and the bugzilla were > functional 24/7. Where have you all been when you saw it was going to hurt > you? it does not hurt me because i was never a gnome user but it hurts me to see that my favourite distribution is packing such a thing as default desktop without any thoughts at the current user base and do not come with "but gnome2 is still not developed any more" RHEL6/CentOS6 is shipping it for years!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org