On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 07:30, Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Plus in a funny way btrfs is now in part un-needed, Funny how so many people think the btrfs designers are morons. Or as if it were a half-baked project cooked hours ago.BTRFS is five years old. "In 2008, the principal developer of the ext3<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext3> and ext4 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4> file systems, Theodore Ts'o<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Ts%27o>, stated that although ext4 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4> has improved features, it is not a major advance, it uses old technology, and is a stop-gap; Ts'o believes that Btrfs is the better direction because "it offers improvements in scalability, reliability, and ease of management".[4]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-3> Btrfs also has "a number of the same design ideas thatreiser3<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReiserFS> /4 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reiser4> had".[5]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-4> " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs BTRfsck is coming along nicely http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg11836.html so, let´s cut the FUD, please... FC -- "The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers." Richard Hamming - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_code
-- users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
