Will McDonald composed on 2024-12-31 00:35 (UTC): > Felix Miata wrote: >> Neither
>> color_list_installed_older=gray >> color_list_installed_newer=gray >> color_list_installed_reinstall=gray >> color_list_installed_running_kernel=gray >> color_list_installed_extra=gray >> color_list_available_upgrade=gray >> color_list_available_downgrade=gray >> color_list_available_install=gray >> color_list_available_reinstall=gray >> color_list_available_running_kernel=gray >> nor >> color_list_installed_older=white >> color_list_installed_newer=white >> color_list_installed_reinstall=white >> color_list_installed_running_kernel=white >> color_list_installed_extra=white >> color_list_available_upgrade=white >> color_list_available_downgrade=white >> color_list_available_install=white >> color_list_available_reinstall=white >> color_list_available_running_kernel=white >> in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf produces any noticeable effect in 41 on running >> dnf upgrade >> Most reporting what it will do is in colors, while most output from >> proceeding >> after y is bright white, with a bit of either red?, brown? or orange?. > What does the following show: > # ls -l `which dnf` > # dnf --dump-main-config | grep color > # dnf --setopt=color_list_available_upgrade=white check-update # ls -l `which dnf` lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Dec 5 19:00 /usr/bin/dnf -> dnf5 # dnf --dump-main-config | grep color color = never color_list_available_downgrade = white color_list_available_install = white color_list_available_reinstall = white color_list_available_upgrade = white color_list_installed_extra = white color_list_installed_newer = white color_list_installed_older = white color_list_installed_reinstall = white color_search_match = bold,magenta color_update_installed = dim,red color_update_local = dim,green color_update_remote = bold,green # dnf --setopt=color_list_available_upgrade=white check-update Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. # > The parsing of dnf is slightly picky about commas/spaces. If that doesn't > show the expected values, check your config. If it does show the right > values, don't know what to say. # grep -i color dnf5.log 2024-12-30T23:09:44+0000 [1858] INFO RPM callback start trigger-install scriptlet "hicolor-icon-theme-0:0.17-19.fc41.noarch" 2024-12-30T23:09:44+0000 [1858] INFO RPM callback stop trigger-install scriptlet "hicolor-icon-theme-0:0.17-19.fc41.noarch" return code 0 2024-12-30T23:09:47+0000 [1858] INFO RPM callback start trigger-post-uninstall scriptlet "hicolor-icon-theme-0:0.17-19.fc41.noarch" 2024-12-30T23:09:47+0000 [1858] INFO RPM callback stop trigger-post-uninstall scriptlet "hicolor-icon-theme-0:0.17-19.fc41.noarch" return code 0 2024-12-31T01:02:18+0000 [1273] INFO --- DNF5 launched with arguments: "dnf --setopt=color_list_available_upgrade=white check-update" --- 2024-12-31T01:05:10+0000 [1334] INFO --- DNF5 launched with arguments: "dnf --setopt=color_list_available_upgrade=white check-update" --- # > Maybe strace the process execution. Do some more digging, there are some > logs in /var/log/dnf* which might shed some light. Until updates become available again, I don't know how to see output I'm familiar with. dnf repolist enabled no longer works, and neither dnf5 repolist enabled. FWIW: # grep term .bashrc tty=$(tty); [ "$tty" != "${tty#/dev/tty[0-9]}" ] && setterm --background blue --foreground white --bold on --store # This is included in root's .bashrc of all several hundred installations here of GNU/Linux distros regardless of breed. It worked nicely until programmers decided supposed "enhancement" for those with excellent eyesight was preferable to works for those whose eyesight isn't as good. Whether it works at all for the colorblind I have doubts. With web browsing we have guidance from W3C to assist in avoiding magnification usability limitations. Elsewhere it seems absent. -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue