On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 06:07:24AM GMT, Tim via users wrote: > On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 08:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Interesting. So, the only thing I see that requires systemd-resolved > > is anaconda-core. However, systemd itself has a 'recommends' for it, > > so perhaps thats what pulled it back in? > > > > So, possibly keeping it installed, but masked is a better way to make > > sure it never gets enabled? > > Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post- > install?
No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way some installs work that it's there. There was some talk about it removing itself at the end, but I am not sure where that ended up. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
