> Am 01.03.2023 um 21:45 schrieb John Mellor <john.mel...@gmail.com>: > > BTRFS is massively faster and safer than all other implementations other than > perhaps ZFS, is at least partially error compensating, does not demand > identical drives, and can be easily converted into other RAID classes > dynamically as desired.
That's a strong claim. And it is basically as false as it is strong. There is a lot of discussion about BTRFS regarding performance and stability. And because BTRFS is so superb fast and reliable, Red Hat has dropped BTRFS in RHEL. They don’t want something so fast and reliable in their distro. This would probably make the (paid) support redundant and reduce the profit. And customers could become overwhelmed and dissatisfied with so much speed. </irony> BTRFS has a number of advantages, but also some disadvantages. A slightly more accurate and less operationally blind presentation would be much more appropriate. As is almost always the case with Technology, it's a matter of balance and differing relevancies. -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy p...@fedoraproject.org Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora docs team contributor Java developer and enthusiast _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
