On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 10:50 PM J.Witvliet--- via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> How about: “lsof -i -n  -P”
>

this will do nicely, Thank You!

>
>
> *From: *"Jack Craig" <jack.craig.ap...@gmail.com>
> *Date:* Saturday, 14 November 2020 at 21:11:39
> *To: *"Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> *Subject:* Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug
>
> is there an easier way to verify a port access to internal host besides
> wireshark & tcpdump?
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:51 AM Jack Craig <jack.craig.ap...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:33 AM Jack Craig <jack.craig.ap...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> this part looked ok to me, but i am not sure.
>>>
>>
>> now seeing higher throughput, but still got...
>>
>> 14-Nov-2020 11:28:20.993 query-errors: info: client @0x7fc8601c9760
>> 52.183.97.231#63450 (linuxlighthouse.com): view external-wan-view: query
>> failed (REFUSED) for linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A at
>> ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270
>> 14-Nov-2020 11:28:21.030 query-errors: info: client @0x7fc8601c9760
>> 20.190.57.96#61806 (www.linuxlighthouse.com): view external-wan-view:
>> query failed (REFUSED) for www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A at
>> ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270
>> 14-Nov-2020 11:28:21.047 query-errors: info: client @0x7fc8601c9760
>> 51.143.102.160#49893 (www.linuxlighthouse.com): view external-wan-view:
>> query failed (REFUSED) for www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/NS at
>> ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270
>>
>> how can i see/test a query's processing between default.log &
>> security.log ?
>> i can see the query, if i could see why it's failing, i'd query this list
>> less. ;)
>>
>> *www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/NS <http://www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/NS> at
>> ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270*
>>
>>
>> *i looked at the query.c @7270 but was unable to gleen any useful
>> insight. *
>>
>> *WRT networking, my block of static ip's is from att.com <http://att.com>*
>>
>> *i have cascaded routers from att's pace unit to a netgear night hawk
>> that does*
>> *port fwding for 53, 80 443 to the 10.0.0.101 sever.*
>> *i use the firewall on the att rtr limiting to the above ports to pass
>> through.*
>>
>> *the NH logs show connects to 53,80, & 443*
>>
>> *i also cranked debug to 10 in named logging, but so far,...*
>>
>>
>> *lastly, as F32 comes w/iptables, i migrated to nftables. *
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
> Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u
> niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is
> toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht
> te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van
> welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het
> elektronisch verzenden van berichten.
>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you
> are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you
> are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State
> accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks
> inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to