On 2020-05-12 07:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: > Does that mean that PackageKit doesn't respect the install_only setting > during a system upgrade? Sounds like a bug. I wonder if there are other > settings it neglects then as well.
It would appear so.... There is a dnf transaction history for the system upgrade using the GNOME Method. 16 | | 2020-05-12 06:19 | E, I, U | 1676 With these entries... Install kernel-5.6.10-300.fc32.x86_64 @updates Install kernel-core-5.6.10-300.fc32.x86_64 @updates Install kernel-modules-5.6.10-300.fc32.x86_64 @updates Upgraded kernel-headers-5.6.7-100.fc30.x86_64 @@System Unlike in a dnf system upgrade which shows (I do have a few more kernel* packages installed this system) Install kernel-5.6.6-300.fc32.x86_64 @fedora Install kernel-core-5.6.6-300.fc32.x86_64 @fedora Install kernel-devel-5.6.6-300.fc32.x86_64 @fedora Install kernel-modules-5.6.6-300.fc32.x86_64 @fedora Install kernel-modules-extra-5.6.6-300.fc32.x86_64 @fedora Upgrade kernel-headers-5.6.6-300.fc32.x86_64 @fedora Removed kernel-5.5.15-200.fc31.x86_64 @@System Removed kernel-core-5.5.15-200.fc31.x86_64 @@System Removed kernel-devel-5.5.15-200.fc31.x86_64 @@System Removed kernel-modules-5.5.15-200.fc31.x86_64 @@System Removed kernel-modules-extra-5.5.15-200.fc31.x86_64 @@System Maybe I'd call it a "transient bug"? :-) -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
