On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 14:47, home user <mattis...@comcast.net> wrote:

> (On 3/16/20 11:36 PM, Samuel wrote)
>  > I assume you're using the original released F31 live image.
>
> No, I'm using whatever F-30 live image the Fedora Media Writer grabbed
> on March 12.  Ah, here it is:
> Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-1.2.iso
> I do not know how up-to-date that actually is.
>
>  > Or you could try out the F32 beta live.
>
> That goes in the opposite direction from what I believe is best for my
> intended use.  I really believe f30 would be best.
>
>  > ... One possibility is that the monitor takes too long to sync up
>  > and the prompt has already gone. I suggest pressing the key as
>  > soon as the computer beeps.
>
> I'll keep that in mind the next time it gets in to one of them moods.
>
>  > You could also check if there's an option in the bios to give
>  > you more time for pressing it.
>
> It's an ASUS Sabertooth Z77.  I checked.  In the Advanced Mode, the Boot
> screen, the Post Delay Time is set to 8 seconds.  I set that years ago,
> when it was not in one of them moods.  (yes, I've seen this problem
> before.)
>
> ASUS has weird power management, see:


https://forum.level1techs.com/t/if-youre-using-an-asus-motherboard-and-run-linux/91326

I was looking at the asus_atk0110 driver when trying to figure out why fan
control is not possible on my ASUS M5A78L-MUSB3 and it comes down to the
fact that the IC on the MB which is responsible for hardware monitoring and
fan control is taken exclusive control over by the BIOS so the kernel has
to communicate with the BIOS over ACPI instead of talking with the chip
directly.

The asus_atk0110 driver does this but is only reading sensors and nothing
else. There is no documentation for the ASUS ACPI tables, which means they
have to be reverse engineered.


Just the sort of kernel tweak that can suffer collateral damage after more
than 5 years of kernel development:
https://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?27676-Turned-off-HPET-but-TSC-is-unstable-any-help


For background:
https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/how-tos-and-troubleshooting/tsc-resynchronization
:


The Linux kernel uses different time sources. The most interesting are the
HPET (High Precision Event Timer) and the TSC (Time Stamp Counter).

The TSC is the preferred clocksource between the two counters, as it is the
fastest one, however it can only be used if it is stable. Currently there
are 4 types of TSC present:


   1. Constant. Constant TSC means that the TSC does not change with CPU
      frequency changes, however it does change on C state transitions.
      2. Invariant. As described in the Intel manual: “The invariant TSC
      will run at a constant rate in all ACPI P-, C- and T-states”
      3. Non-stop. The Non-stop TSC has the properties of both Constant and
      Invariant TSC.
      4. None of the above. The TSC changes with the C, P and S state
      transitions.


By looking into the flags entry in /proc/cpuinfo we can determine what type
of TSC the current processor has (possible values we check for are
constant_tsc, nonstop_tsc)


My desktop does have both: constant_tsc, nonstop_tsc

From
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Linux-Disabling-HPET-CoffeeLake
(discussing
lnux 5.4 and recent stable kernels):

Some Coffee Lake systems have a skewed HPET timer when entering the PC10
power state and that in turn marks the time stamp counter (TSC) as unstable.



Workarounds from Intel for issues like this can result in collateral damage
for older systems.   The bug seems to be with Intel firmware, so
workarounds may be temporary.

I'll respond to George and Tom, and then come back to netinstall.
> [...]



-- 
George N. White III
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to