--- On Mon, 6/14/10, Steve Underwood <ste...@coppice.org> wrote: > On 06/14/2010 11:20 PM, Patrick > Bartek wrote: > > >> [snip] > > I thought 10.1 was the one with the problem. In > any case, I don't think the "hole" will cause much problems > with Linux based systems. When you read of the panic > attacks people are having, it's usually about Windows > systems. > > > > B > > > I believe 10.1 is supposed to be the "big fix" for problems > in > 10.0.<something>. They wouldn't have release 10.1 > last Friday if it was > supposed to have the serious fault they reported a few days > before, > would they? You cut the part of my message where I said > 10.1 on a 32 bit > machine appears to be causing kernel faults. If it can do > that, who know > what nasty things it could do if its insecure.
Well, 10.1 really "fixed" everything, didn't it? Even the Windows users had major problems with it. A kernel fault? Bad code, probably. Do programmers do flow charts anymore? B -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
