On 07/24/2017 01:13 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 07/23/17 20:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
First, I hardly ever use firefox. I have it set up to use a network
proxy for a
specific use case that I occasionally need. With that in mind.
My "thought" process and diagnosis when about like this.... ....
Snip ....
+
I can probably do this in the event of another similar problem and
have saved this to my notes.
Thank you
After going through this thread and looking at Ed's replies as to "what
to do" (being "setsebool -P unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition 0"), I
went back to my "NVidia instead of nouveau" issues (which included a
thread with Ed explaining to me some stuff I did not understand).
Ed's suggestion of "setsebool -P unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition 0"
is exactly what SELinux advises me to do now that I have NVidia instead
of nouveau installed when dealing with Firefox issues.
Am I to gather the this "setsebool -P
unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition 0" suggestion pretty much is a
global statement to say "*anything* that SELinux pings in anything
dealing with Firefox" will be ignored once this setsebool rule is enacted?
Not making value judgment with that statement, just trying to understand
how big the scope of that SELinux rules is. For the record, I have not
granted that exception as I have yet to see any problem with NVidia and
Firefox that requires an intervention.
Thanks for any advice,
Paul
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
