On 04/09/2010 09:14 AM, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> On 04/09/2010 04:11 PM, Ray Pittigher wrote:
>>
>> On 04/09/2010 08:40 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Ray Pittigher<raymond.pittig...@itt.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Having some problems installing rpm packages,what does it mean when every
>>>> package claims it is the wrong architecture?
>>>>
>>>> for example..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> rpm -Uvh python-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64.rpm python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.*
>>>> python-urlgrabber-3.1.0-5.el5.noarch.rpm
>>>> Preparing... ###########################################
>>>> [100%]
>>>> package python-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64 is intended for a x86_64
>>>> architecture
>>>> package python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.i386 is intended for a i386
>>>> architecture
>>>> package python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64 is intended for a
>>>> x86_64 architecture
>>>> package python-urlgrabber-3.1.0-5.el5.noarch is intended for a
>>>> noarch architecture
>>>>
>>> If your
>>> uname -i
>>>
>>> doesn't match the output from
>>>
>>> rpm -qp --queryformat "%{arch}\n" package_name.rpm
>>>
>>> Then it will send that error. In this case it's trying to install an
>>> x86_64 rpm but you may be running something else.
>>>
>>> What is the output from 'uname -i' on your system?
>>>
>> It does not seem to make a difference on what package I try to install
>>
>> rpm -Uvh zenity-2.16.0-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
>> Preparing... ###########################################
>> [100%]
>> package zenity-2.16.0-2.el5.x86_64 is intended for a x86_64
>> architecture
>>
>>
>> uname -a
>> Linux server.lab.com 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 #1 SMP Wed Nov 5 09:00:19 EST
>> 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are
>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
>> addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the
>> sender.
>> Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
>> those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT
>> Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for
>> the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by
>> any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>>
> So this is a RH/CentOS system, right? yum repolist?
Yes that is true a RH/CentOS PC that I am learning on.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
