On 04/09/2010 04:11 PM, Ray Pittigher wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2010 08:40 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>    
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Ray Pittigher<raymond.pittig...@itt.com>   
>> wrote:
>>      
>>> Having some problems installing rpm packages,what does it mean when every 
>>> package claims it is the wrong architecture?
>>>
>>> for example..
>>>
>>>
>>> rpm  -Uvh python-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64.rpm python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.* 
>>> python-urlgrabber-3.1.0-5.el5.noarch.rpm
>>> Preparing...                ########################################### 
>>> [100%]
>>>          package python-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64 is intended for a x86_64 
>>> architecture
>>>          package python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.i386 is intended for a i386 
>>> architecture
>>>          package python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64 is intended for a x86_64 
>>> architecture
>>>          package python-urlgrabber-3.1.0-5.el5.noarch is intended for a 
>>> noarch architecture
>>>        
>> If your
>>      uname -i
>>
>> doesn't match the output from
>>
>>     rpm -qp --queryformat "%{arch}\n" package_name.rpm
>>
>> Then it will send that error.  In this case it's trying to install an
>> x86_64 rpm but you may be running something else.
>>
>> What is the output from 'uname -i' on your system?
>>      
> It does not seem to make a difference on what package I try to install
>
> rpm -Uvh zenity-2.16.0-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
> Preparing...                ###########################################
> [100%]
>          package zenity-2.16.0-2.el5.x86_64 is intended for a x86_64 
> architecture
>
>
>    uname -a
> Linux server.lab.com 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 #1 SMP Wed Nov 5 09:00:19 EST
> 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are 
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
> addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender.
> Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely 
> those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT 
> Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for 
> the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by 
> any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>    
So this is a RH/CentOS system, right? yum repolist?
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Reply via email to