Dear Friends & Kannel Team,

Got a serious Issue.

*Server  A:* Centos 6.5 Server with Kannel svn-r5122., 4 GB RAM, 1TB HDD

*Server B:* Centos 6.5 with LAMP Stack , MYSQL 5.5.1, 3.2 Ghz Xeon, 8 GB,
1TD HDD

*Server C: *"Virtual Machine " Centos 6.5 with LAMP Stack , MYSQL 5.5.1, 1
Ghz 1 GB RAM

*Server D:* Windows 7 with Xampp , MYSQL 5..1

If I run Kannel on Server A with mysql db on Server B, TPS per session=15

If I run Kannel on Server A with mysql db on Server C or Server D  TPS per
session=90

I ran mysql benchmark also. Serverc is 5 times low on benchmark test. Still
why my Physical Server is so low on T.P.S.

I changed the mysql db server only. Kannel on the Server A only.

Please guide me. I am struggling from past 4 months.







*Rajeev Krishna*

Operations Manager
Krishnas Software Technologies
www.krishnasoft.in
mobile   :+91 888 5815 888
Sales     :+91 888 5813 888
Support :+91 888 5817 888

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:00 AM, spameden <spame...@gmail.com> wrote:

> quick googling (only took me 30 seconds):
>
> http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/009745.html
> http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2013-June/019873.html
> http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2008-March/004260.html
> http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2007-February/001541.html
> http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2014-June/021242.html
>
> etc...
>
> in short:
>
> 1) test with fakesmsc where no SMPP remote binds involved with memory
> storage and measure throughput with sqlbox or smsbox.
> 2) add DLR handling
> 3) add MySQL DLR handling and see how it goes
> 4) if you need additional hit-url add it and measure again
> 5) check mysql slow-log as well as mysql queries/sec variable via
> mysqladmin pr, add needed index for dlr table (discussed many times for
> quick ts,smsc_id matching)
> 6) check your connection with remote binds via tcpdump/ettercap/wireshark
> if you're losing any packets or there are many re-transmissions going on
> 7) connect your remote binds and test again
>
> as said 1000 x times kannel is usually NOT a problem, most problems
> involved either with incorrect setup of middle software or your remote SMSC
> upstream.
>
> 2014-11-06 8:05 GMT+03:00 RK Krishnas <r...@krishnasoft.in>:
>
>> Dear Team,
>>
>> Please Suggest the best way or guide us for the proper approach.
>> I saw 25 Answers saying Search in mailing List, Search In google.
>> But I spent 2 weeks for the same & no result at all.
>> Many told to tweak sqlbox & mysql. No one gave the solution.
>> I personally mailed 5 members who said that they solved the issue. They
>> never posted back the settings nor the steps.
>>
>>
>> Problem:
>> SQLBOX<==>BEARERBOX<==>SMSC<==>MOBILE.
>>
>> Here each session is getting an average of 10 tps only.  Even the ack &
>> dlr are queued up in store.
>>
>>
>> Please provide us the solution & i promise that I will reply to all users
>> who keep asking the questions for tps & sqlbox.
>>
>>
>> *Rajeev Krishna*
>>
>> Operations Manager
>> Krishnas Software Technologies
>> www.krishnasoft.in
>> mobile   :+91 888 5815 888
>> Sales     :+91 888 5813 888
>> Support :+91 888 5817 888
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Willy Mularto <sangpr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just joke mate, I agree with you. Saw many same posts from Aditya.
>>> On 5 Nov 2014 19:08, "spameden" <spame...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's not the first time I see this message from Aditya.
>>>>
>>>> If you google a bit you'll understand what I mean.
>>>>
>>>> Don't get me wrong I just don't like people who can't put a bit effort
>>>> into problem solving and want complete final solution from others.
>>>>
>>>> If you really want to solve this way -- rent a kannel specialist and
>>>> pay him money for his work (hourly-based).
>>>>
>>>> 2014-11-05 15:01 GMT+03:00 Willy Mularto <sangpr...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Is that really 100500 questions? LOL. Maybe he needs your guidance
>>>>> mate.
>>>>> On 5 Nov 2014 18:16, "spameden" <spame...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please stop SPAMMING kannel lists?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really annoying to get 100500 questions on the same issue from you
>>>>>> all time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You could read a bit of mailing lists, this question has been covered
>>>>>> many times already and there were many suggestions why you might be 
>>>>>> having
>>>>>> low performance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-11-05 10:05 GMT+03:00 Aditya Khanna <
>>>>>> aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Hello Everyone,*
>>>>>>> I'm new with Kannel SMS Gateway. I have configured Kannel as my
>>>>>>> requirements.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is my Gateway Architecture:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *HTTP Application <----> BBox** <----> SQLBox** <----> SMSBox**
>>>>>>> <----> SMSCs*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * <----> Mobile*
>>>>>>> Now, the problem is that When I'm observing send_sms table that are
>>>>>>> created by SQLBox then It sends 10 msgs/sec to particular connected 
>>>>>>> SMSBox.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So please suggest me that how to improve this speed in SQLBox.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Thanks,*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Aditya Khanna*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to