quick googling (only took me 30 seconds): http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/009745.html http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2013-June/019873.html http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2008-March/004260.html http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2007-February/001541.html http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2014-June/021242.html
etc... in short: 1) test with fakesmsc where no SMPP remote binds involved with memory storage and measure throughput with sqlbox or smsbox. 2) add DLR handling 3) add MySQL DLR handling and see how it goes 4) if you need additional hit-url add it and measure again 5) check mysql slow-log as well as mysql queries/sec variable via mysqladmin pr, add needed index for dlr table (discussed many times for quick ts,smsc_id matching) 6) check your connection with remote binds via tcpdump/ettercap/wireshark if you're losing any packets or there are many re-transmissions going on 7) connect your remote binds and test again as said 1000 x times kannel is usually NOT a problem, most problems involved either with incorrect setup of middle software or your remote SMSC upstream. 2014-11-06 8:05 GMT+03:00 RK Krishnas <r...@krishnasoft.in>: > Dear Team, > > Please Suggest the best way or guide us for the proper approach. > I saw 25 Answers saying Search in mailing List, Search In google. > But I spent 2 weeks for the same & no result at all. > Many told to tweak sqlbox & mysql. No one gave the solution. > I personally mailed 5 members who said that they solved the issue. They > never posted back the settings nor the steps. > > > Problem: > SQLBOX<==>BEARERBOX<==>SMSC<==>MOBILE. > > Here each session is getting an average of 10 tps only. Even the ack & > dlr are queued up in store. > > > Please provide us the solution & i promise that I will reply to all users > who keep asking the questions for tps & sqlbox. > > > *Rajeev Krishna* > > Operations Manager > Krishnas Software Technologies > www.krishnasoft.in > mobile :+91 888 5815 888 > Sales :+91 888 5813 888 > Support :+91 888 5817 888 > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Willy Mularto <sangpr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just joke mate, I agree with you. Saw many same posts from Aditya. >> On 5 Nov 2014 19:08, "spameden" <spame...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> It's not the first time I see this message from Aditya. >>> >>> If you google a bit you'll understand what I mean. >>> >>> Don't get me wrong I just don't like people who can't put a bit effort >>> into problem solving and want complete final solution from others. >>> >>> If you really want to solve this way -- rent a kannel specialist and pay >>> him money for his work (hourly-based). >>> >>> 2014-11-05 15:01 GMT+03:00 Willy Mularto <sangpr...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Is that really 100500 questions? LOL. Maybe he needs your guidance >>>> mate. >>>> On 5 Nov 2014 18:16, "spameden" <spame...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Can you please stop SPAMMING kannel lists? >>>>> >>>>> Really annoying to get 100500 questions on the same issue from you all >>>>> time. >>>>> >>>>> You could read a bit of mailing lists, this question has been covered >>>>> many times already and there were many suggestions why you might be having >>>>> low performance. >>>>> >>>>> 2014-11-05 10:05 GMT+03:00 Aditya Khanna < >>>>> aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Hello Everyone,* >>>>>> I'm new with Kannel SMS Gateway. I have configured Kannel as my >>>>>> requirements. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is my Gateway Architecture: >>>>>> >>>>>> *HTTP Application <----> BBox** <----> SQLBox** <----> SMSBox** >>>>>> <----> SMSCs* >>>>>> >>>>>> * <----> Mobile* >>>>>> Now, the problem is that When I'm observing send_sms table that are >>>>>> created by SQLBox then It sends 10 msgs/sec to particular connected >>>>>> SMSBox. >>>>>> >>>>>> So please suggest me that how to improve this speed in SQLBox. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Thanks,* >>>>>> >>>>>> *Aditya Khanna* >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >
