You're right mt traffic is perfect but i think the problem is when sqlbox is
trying to read from bearerbox, i'm trying to find some evidence but the
issue appears to be in the method read_from_box(Connection *conn, Boxc
*boxconn) but i'm also confused because is almost a carbon copy
of read_from_bearerbox_real(Connection *conn, Msg **msg, double seconds).

Anyway, if i have any info i'll send it here.



2010/1/13 Alejandro Guerrieri <alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com>

> Some MO's are dropped under heavy traffic.
>
> MT traffic is NOT affected at all.
>
> Not sure about DLR's (didn't experienced myself, but since DLR's and MO's
> are fairly similar... maybe)
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Kenny <ken.bell...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is the loss on MO or MT or BOTH ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kenny
>> w: www.nuObjects.com
>> Bulk SMS Solutions | Managed Hosting | Enterprise Application Development
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri <
>> alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My patch adds support for meta-data on _all_ DB engines, not only mysql.
>>> Have you tried with other DB engines?
>>>
>>> Anyway, there seems to be another (still unknown) problem, perhaps not
>>> related with sqlbox itself but with the way sqlbox talks with bearerbox. We
>>> still need to do extra testing to determine where the problem occurs.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruno Aguirre <
>>> brunoaguirreris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi to all!.
>>>> I'm running some tests with SMPP Sim and a cvs kannel with the
>>>> sqlbox-meta. The "meta-data-aware" patch is quite similar to my original
>>>> patch, i'm having the same issues than before, some loss between sqlbox and
>>>> smsbox.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone is having similar issues?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2009/12/29 Alejandro Guerrieri <alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so maybe the problem is related to the way bearerbox and sqlbox
>>>>> exchange messages. Good to know...
>>>>>
>>>>>  Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Willy <sangpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I use cvs 20090114 (pre meta data) with sqlbox 0.72, tested against
>>>>>> 100 thousands MO, speed around 100 MO/sec. Still fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Willy
>>>>>> Sent from my Sony Ericsson XPERIA™ X1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> From: Alejandro Guerrieri <alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Sent: 29 December 2009 18:41
>>>>>> To: Willy Mularto <sangpr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Cc: ken.bell...@gmail.com; users@kannel.org; de...@kannel.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: SQLBox Issues and Limit per cycle SQLBox patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You asked for it, you've got it ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Sorry, I'm cross-posting this one, since it's probably people
>>>>>> interested on both lists for different reasons]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.kannel.org/~aguerrieri/SqlBox/Snapshots/sqlbox-meta-20091229.tar.gz<http://www.kannel.org/%7Eaguerrieri/SqlBox/Snapshots/sqlbox-meta-20091229.tar.gz>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This snapshot is not commited to CVS yet, since it needs proper
>>>>>> testing on ALL DB engines: mysql, postgres, sqlite(2), sqlite3, oracle,
>>>>>> mssql/sybase and sdb. Volunteers are needed to test all of them (I'll do 
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> best as well, but any help is appreciated).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To build it, run ./bootstrap first, then ./configure
>>>>>> --with-<dbengine>, make and sudo make install. You need a Kannel compiled
>>>>>> with support for the same DB engine you're going to use of course.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WARNING: There still seems to be an issue with MO under heavy load:
>>>>>> some messages are lost. After further testing, this doesn't seem to be
>>>>>> related with meta-data at all. To reproduce the error, you need to put
>>>>>> sqlbox between bearerbox and smsbox and use it to capture all traffic (MO
>>>>>> and MT). Then, if you sent a bunch of messages from a fake smsc at high
>>>>>> rates (100 or more messages with .01 delay is enough to cause it), some 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> them are not recorded nor forwarded to smsbox. I need to investigate it
>>>>>> further, I've only tried with mysql so far, so I'm not sure if this is a 
>>>>>> DB
>>>>>> problem, or something related with threading or so. Actually I think the
>>>>>> same problem would happen with a pre-meta-data kannel version (anyone can
>>>>>> confirm this?).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOTE: There's NO problem with MT, if you use SqlBox to send messages
>>>>>> by inserting on send_sms, then you won't notice any problems at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last but not least, I'm out of luck building on Snow Leopard. It
>>>>>> compiles but segfaults afterwards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [The entire original message is not included]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to