> On Mar 13, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > > Jay, > > thanks for your feedback > >> What if instead we called it KStreamsBuilder? > > That's the current name and I personally think it's not the best one. > The main reason why I don't like KStreamsBuilder is, that we have the > concepts of KStreams and KTables, and the builder creates both. However, > the name puts he focus on KStream and devalues KTable. > > I understand your argument, and I am personally open the remove the > "Topology" part, and name it "StreamsBuilder". Not sure what others > think about this.
If you worry about that, you could consider "KafkaStreamsBuilder" which highlights that it is about Kafka Streams the project as opposed to KStream the feature. A little bit wordier, but you probably only type it a couple times.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
