+1, this is what Wikimedia uses in production.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Tauzell, Dave <dave.tauz...@surescripts.com
> wrote:

> I haven't started using this in production but this is how I will likely
> setup the logging as it is easier to manage.
>
> -Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dustin Cote [mailto:dus...@confluent.io]
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 9:33 AM
> To: users@kafka.apache.org; d...@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Changing default logger to RollingFileAppender (KAFKA-2394)
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking at changing the Kafka default logging setup to use the
> RollingFileAppender instead of the DailyRollingFileAppender in an effort to
> accomplish two goals:
> 1) Avoid filling up users' disks if the log files grow unexpectedly
> 2) Move off the admittedly unreliable DailyRollingFileAppender
>
> I wanted to know if the community has any feedback around this before
> moving forward.  The main drawback with going to the RollingFileAppender is
> that the log file names will no longer have timestamps, but instead be of
> the form server.log, server.log.1, etc.  What users are depending on the
> file name convention and would need to rollback the log4j configuration
> should the default change in a later version?  What sort of feedback can
> those users provide to help us document this the right way?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Dustin Cote
> confluent.io
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
> contain sensitive information, and are intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this
> e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail immediately and
> destroy all copies of the e-mail and any attachments.
>

Reply via email to