There is also a Ganglia reporter for metrics. Don't know how much overhead it adds though.
Thanks, Jun On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com > wrote: > Hi Jun, > > Does that imply that what 0.8 puts in JMX is a superset of what's in JMX > in 0.7? > Or have names or types of beans changed? > > Also, do you recommend getting metrics via JMX or via HTTP? > > Thanks, > Otis > ---- > Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase / Hadoop - > http://sematext.com/spm > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> > >To: "users@kafka.apache.org" <users@kafka.apache.org> > >Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:20 AM > >Subject: Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX > > > > > >0.8 JMX is different from 0.7. In 0.8, all jmx beans are exposed through > >metrics. One can attach a metric reporter for monitoring. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Jun > > > > > >On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < > otis.gospodne...@gmail.com > >> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> We're considering adding Kafka monitoring to SPM (see > >> http://sematext.com/spm/index.html ). We use Kafka ourselves and > >> would like to see our Kafka metrics in SPM along with Hadoop, HBase, > >> Solr, and other metrics we monitor. > >> > >> My questions: > >> * What do people currently use for monitoring Kafka? > >> * Is there apetite for adding Kafka support to SPM? > >> * How different is the structure/content of JMX for 0.7 vs. 0.8? Is > >> 0.8 a backwards-compatible superset of 0.7? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Otis > >> -- > >> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html > >> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > >> > > > > > > >
