Hi Jun, Does that imply that what 0.8 puts in JMX is a superset of what's in JMX in 0.7? Or have names or types of beans changed?
Also, do you recommend getting metrics via JMX or via HTTP? Thanks, Otis ---- Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase / Hadoop - http://sematext.com/spm >________________________________ > From: Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> >To: "users@kafka.apache.org" <users@kafka.apache.org> >Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:20 AM >Subject: Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX > > >0.8 JMX is different from 0.7. In 0.8, all jmx beans are exposed through >metrics. One can attach a metric reporter for monitoring. > >Thanks, > >Jun > > >On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis.gospodne...@gmail.com >> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We're considering adding Kafka monitoring to SPM (see >> http://sematext.com/spm/index.html ). We use Kafka ourselves and >> would like to see our Kafka metrics in SPM along with Hadoop, HBase, >> Solr, and other metrics we monitor. >> >> My questions: >> * What do people currently use for monitoring Kafka? >> * Is there apetite for adding Kafka support to SPM? >> * How different is the structure/content of JMX for 0.7 vs. 0.8? Is >> 0.8 a backwards-compatible superset of 0.7? >> >> Thanks, >> Otis >> -- >> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html >> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html >> > > >
