Oops, wrong list. It was a Tomcat issue, so he meant Tomcat users. Sorry for the confusion.
- Milo Hyson Chief Scientist CyberLife Labs, Inc. On Nov 4, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Yehuda Katz <yeh...@ymkatz.net> wrote: > It is 100% not appropriate for HTTPD's Bugzilla since it is not a bug or > documentation issue. Since I can't find the Bugzilla note you are referring > to, I can't say for sure, but I expect it was effectively a canned response > that the issue was not a bug and you should go to the list. > > It is not clear how your original post on this list relates to Apache HTTPD > Server, which is the focus of this list. > This is not a forum to debate general HTML practices that have no relation to > the server software/configuration. > > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Milo Hyson <m...@cyberlifelabs.com> wrote: > I was instructed to bring this discussion to this list from bugzilla. If that > instruction was incorrect, I apologize. > > - Milo Hyson > Chief Scientist > CyberLife Labs, Inc. > > On Nov 4, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Yehuda Katz <yeh...@ymkatz.net> wrote: > >> This is not an Apache HTTPD issue. >> >> That said, the article you linked to is specifically about WordPress - >> defending their decision to make ALL links absolute links. >> I worked on a government project (using Wordpress) that required that all >> URLs be relative unless absolutely necessary and we had to add a plugin to >> undo all of that linking. >> >> - Y >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Milo Hyson <m...@cyberlifelabs.com> wrote: >> I've been using relative links in content for many years without any >> trouble. It has been suggested this is a bad practice, but the reasons given >> I haven't found terribly convincing. I may be wrong, but it seems as though >> people are using relative linking as a scapegoat for generally bad practices. >> >> Take the following article for instance: >> http://yoast.com/relative-urls-issues/ >> >> The way I see it, if broken links are being deployed then testing isn't >> thorough enough. If a test environment is accessible to uninvolved parties >> (e.g. spiders) then testing isn't controlled enough. If multiple paths exist >> to the same content without good reason, then the architecture is poor. >> >> Looking around Google, this seems to be rather representative of the >> arguments. Relative links are bad because when they're combined with other >> issues that should never happen the results are undesirable. That's not good >> enough for me. Does anybody have a better reason? >> >> - Milo Hyson >> Chief Scientist >> CyberLife Labs, Inc. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org >> >> > >
