On 10/2/2014 7:34 AM, Sophie <[email protected]> wrote: > He is not blamed for bringing his pet bug, but for not being proactive > on it and for waiting that a volunteer take care of it without helping > in any way to have it solved.
I have helped in every way that I can. 1. I am not a coder, so I cannot fix it myself, 2. I am not independently wealthy, and my boss won't pay for this kind of stuff, so I cannot pay for bug fixes, 3. I participated in the process as soon as I became aware of the regression, including creating an 'enhancement request' that should be extremely trivial to implement (because the functionality/behavior, invokable by CTRL-SHIFT-F9 is still there) to workaround the major regression that has been totally ignored (and one that I would dearly love to see made permanent), and lastly, 4. I don't think that being asked to pay for fixing major regressions is even remotely reasonable, *especially* when a workaround/fix (to reintroduce the old behavior at least as a workaround until the bug is fixed, if not simply as a permanent option) is available - and I consider anyone who suggests with a straight face that I should have to pay $4,000+ to get it fixed as an extortionist. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
