NoOp wrote
> On 07/04/2014 12:37 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
>> Hi :)
>> There are a few reasons;
>> *  Base needs an external back-end but most new users wont be aware of
>> that
> 
> Interesting. I never knew that Base "needs an external back-end"...
> Perhaps you can get the documentation folks to add that to the help
> files and the Base docs

This will be unlikely to happen in the short term as the so-called "split"
configuration is considered to be for experts only. The idea behind the
"embedded" configuration (i.e., a database back-end inside an ODF container)
was developed to mask some of the database back-end detail and for
portability. While simpler, the embedded configuration is reported as
suffering greater data loss / corruption issues, due to the nature of the
packaging. 

There are numerous threads over on the Apache OO forum about problems with
the embedded configuration. There is also a lengthy and detailed discussion
about  Base / ODF container portability
<http://en.libreofficeforum.org/node/7876>   that provides several links to
the mentioned Apache OO forum threads. Summary: In order for a "split"
configuration to become more widespread it would be ideal for some sort of
pack-n-go facility to be developed for Base to allow greater portability of
data in a manner more in keeping with office documents.

Best wishes, Owen.



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-MariaDB-Announce-MariaDB-Galera-Cluster-10-0-12-GA-and-MariaDB-10-1-0-Alpha-now-available-tp4114577p4114677.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to