Johnny Rosenberg wrote: > Since then I always make sure no RTF files comes near me ever.
I have all due respect for your opinion and choice and I am glad you have the option to do that. I had never thought of saving all documents in RTF (maybe not a bad idea), but I do find RTF very useful for the purpose for which it was designed: portability. I have used RTF to send Documents and Data/Reports to recipients with diverse Office-Applications that did NOT have a choice with the Office-Application they were using (so I have successfully used RTF for portability). Sean Burke in RTF Pocket Guide wrote: > For no really good reason, support for these RTF character sets is > perfiect in some word processors, almost perfect in others..., and shoddy > in others... The capability of applications that state or imply RTF functionality is not a reflection of RTF, but on the competence (hence professionalism) of the developers that implement the Open/Import and Save-As/Export routines. This is true of *all* software: that includes the Microsoft Word Veiwer 2003 that has problems correctly displaying the Word2002RTFSpec.doc. Just FYI, Tracey I normally do NOT use a screw driver as a substitute for a hammer, but I have used a heavy duty screw driver to pound the lid back on a paint can. I am not upset that screwdrivers are not hammers. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RTF-support-tp3114703p3121621.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] In case of problems unsubscribing, write to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
