On 2011-05-30 11:42 AM, Roland Hughes wrote: > Editing and/or responding within the "original message" is considered > tampering with evidence.
Rotflmao even harder! Roland, where do you get this garbage? Do you make it up as you go? > Everyone is supposed to TOP POST, not only to save developer time, Stop it, please, my sides are hurting! > but to allow the legal teams to read from the bottom up on the last > message identifying how things progressed this far. Sorry, I don't modify my personal habits to fit the needs of Outlook weened lawyer drones. The chain of evidence for legal purposes is in the ORIGINAL emails, not endlessly/mindlessly quoted copies of stupid email signatures and mindless and unenforceable legal disclaimers. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
