There’s some weirdness with MDL, but we’ve found that simply wrapping MDL in a js:Div and reapplying some CSS works just fine.
In general wrapping JS libs works just fine. You should use bracket access instead of dot access for properties unless you deal with externs (which is currently a topic which is more advanced than it should be). That’s to prevent magnification problems. HTH, Harbs > On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:41 AM, gkk gb <modjkl...@comcast.net> wrote: > > It was this post > > > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-MDL-Mixing-Basic-and-MDL-td59300.html > > > and Carlos' comments, e.g. "I don't recommend to use FlexJS Components at all > if you use MDL set." > > > I wonder if things have changed since then, to allow one to mix and match in > the same layout... > > >> >> On August 7, 2017 at 2:27 PM piotrz <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> As far as I know Harbs and Yishay combined FlexJS MDL module (which is >> actually wrappers around MDL [1]) with components from Basic thanks to >> some >> additional tweaks in CSS. >> >> I'm not sure whether that is what you are asking? >> >> [1] https://getmdl.io/components/index.html >> >> Piotr >> >> ----- >> Apache Flex PMC >> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/scoping-out-FlexJS-to-replace-Flex-tp15614p15633.html >> Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>
