Thank You Ivan. I am very grateful for the response.
On 2021/09/23 09:01:42, Ivan Kudryavtsev <[email protected]> wrote: > Abishek, > > NFS over a bunch of drives works just fine but has no means for failover > (out of the box, when self-built). If your benchmark shows enough IO > performance per VM, then NFS is just the way to go. > Keep in mind that NFS can have various backing store technologies like > NetApp appliances, Ceph, plain RAID volumes - it leads to different > performance levels and reliability guarantees. As for accessor, NFS is OK. > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:56 PM Abishek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Every One, > > > > We are planning to go into cloud production with cloudstack 4.15 and KVM > > host. We are currently considering nfs as storage because of the > > performance. Is it feasible to use NFS as primary storage type in > > production environment. Will there be any bottleneck of any offsets in > > future(if any one has deployed nfs as storage in production). Shall I > > prefer iscsi with NFS or any other storage type above NFS for production > > environment. > > > > Thank You. > > >
