Thank You Alex for the information. I will take that into consideration.
On 2021/09/23 10:12:39, Alex Mattioli <[email protected]> wrote: > I second what he said, I've ran ACS zones with 60+ hypervisors and 2,000 VMs > from one single pair of storage servers delivering , all on NFS and no issues > at all. > > Just be sure to select the right vendor and size it correctly. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ivan Kudryavtsev <[email protected]> > Sent: 23 September 2021 11:02 > To: users <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Recommendation for Storage. > > Abishek, > > NFS over a bunch of drives works just fine but has no means for failover (out > of the box, when self-built). If your benchmark shows enough IO performance > per VM, then NFS is just the way to go. > Keep in mind that NFS can have various backing store technologies like NetApp > appliances, Ceph, plain RAID volumes - it leads to different performance > levels and reliability guarantees. As for accessor, NFS is OK. > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:56 PM Abishek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Every One, > > > > We are planning to go into cloud production with cloudstack 4.15 and > > KVM host. We are currently considering nfs as storage because of the > > performance. Is it feasible to use NFS as primary storage type in > > production environment. Will there be any bottleneck of any offsets in > > future(if any one has deployed nfs as storage in production). Shall I > > prefer iscsi with NFS or any other storage type above NFS for > > production environment. > > > > Thank You. > > >
