XCP-ng 7.4, 7.6 should work just fine with 4.13 - hope that answers all 3 questions.
XCP-ng 8.x is not yet supported (might be in 4.15/summer LTS release) cheers On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 12:36, Olivier GUIN <[email protected]> wrote: > hello Andrija, > > I have just set up a Xenserver 7.6 cluster, but I think that the license > problem will be a brake! > - Does Cloudstack work optimally with XCP-NG? > - If YES until which version? > - Will XCP-NG be compatible with the future Cloudstack 4.14? > > Cheers, > > Olivier > Le 24/04/2020 à 08:59, Andrija Panic a écrit : > > Not necessarily - i.e. you should still observe multiple hundredns of > megabits/sec with default VR offering, with the routing process. > I would pay attention to the network throttling set on XS side, as Vivek > has already suggested in another email. > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 13:51, Olivier GUIN <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Andrija, > > You wrote that there would be my CPU / RAM ratio which would cause the > throttled on my interface. > What would be the right CPU / RAM ratio? > > If you have a recommendation. > > I think my problem comes from there .. > I made a VM with 4GB RAM and 4 vCPU at 2Ghz and it works very well! > (Linux/Windows) > > Cheers, > Olivier > > Le 23/04/2020 à 17:33, Andrija Panic a écrit : > > (mon français n'est pas si bon) - but if that is a physical server - than > it's a valid test - beside the traffic will go through the VR (from VM > > via > > VR to that external host) - here you have NAT over relatively slow VR > (CPU/RAM) and over the throttled interface most probably. > > In general, you should not keep mixed XS versions (whatever is true for > XenServer alone, irrelevant of the CloudStack), as 7.x is a big > > difference > > to 6.5 and i.e. VM live migrations will not work (and I'm sure many other > things, possibly) > > That being said, make sure to TEST the upgrade (pool master, then slaves, > then see how to reconnect hosts to ACS, etc, etc) - if this is your test > env - better start from scratch. > > 7.1 LTSR is recommended over 7.0 any day. > > Cheers > Andrija > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:22, Olivier GUIN <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > Hi Andrija, > > Thank for your anwser ... > > 1) My Cloudstack is 4.13 > > 2) Can I mix a version of xen 6.5 and xen 7 in the same cluster? (I > > think > > I cannot move a VM from one cluster to another) > > 3) 200.13.xxx.xxx est un de mes serveurs sur mon réseau physique > > I think the problem comes from my service offerings > > I keep looking ... > > But I think upgrading my Xen servers from 6.5 to 7 is a good idea. > > Point 2 is important ! > > Regards, > > Olivier > Le 23/04/2020 à 16:02, Andrija Panic a écrit : > > Hi Olivier, > > Upgrade to 4.13 should not be a problem here. I would suggest: > > > - checking traffic shaping on XenServer side - to confirm what is/is not > in place (we don't know your network offerings/compute offerings network > rates and such) > - Confirm VM/drivers used inside VMs are all up to date (6.5 is an > > ancient > > thing, not supported any more in ACS 4.14 that will be out soon) > > > You are doing: iperf3 -c 200.13.XXX.XXX -p5001 > > Why are you connecting to the IP of the VR? What kind of testing is this > supposed to be/show what? > > > > Why not starting iperf server on Centos 7 and connect to it from Windows > 2012 (and the other way around)? > This traffic is NOT going over the virtual router, but just via the same > "network" on XS. > > I'll try ok > > > Alternatively, you can deploy VPC (multiple isolated networks behind a > > VR) > > - and have VM1 in network1, VM2 in network2 - and do iperf between them > (traffic router via VR) - here keep in mind even if your VM's NIC are > 1Gbps, but your VR NICs are 100 Mbps, you will be limited to the slowest > nic in the whole path/chain - 100 Mbps. > > OK > > > Regards, > Andrija > - > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 20:34, Olivier Guin <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > Some news : > > from VM to SRV : > > [root@centos7 centos]# iperf3 -c 200.13.XXX.XXX -p5001 > Connecting to host 200.13.XXX.XXX, port 5001 > [ 4] local 10.0.1.42 port 56190 connected to 200.13.XXX.XXX port 5001 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd > [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.9 MBytes 108 Mbits/sec 77 55.1 KBytes > [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.9 MBytes 100 Mbits/sec 51 45.2 KBytes > [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.96 MBytes 83.6 Mbits/sec 36 28.3 KBytes > [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.37 MBytes 78.6 Mbits/sec 33 25.5 KBytes > [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 93.5 Mbits/sec 24 50.9 KBytes > [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.2 Mbits/sec 24 82.0 KBytes > [ 4] 6.00-7.07 sec 12.9 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec 38 143 KBytes > [ 4] 7.07-8.07 sec 9.03 MBytes 75.2 Mbits/sec 13 123 KBytes > [ 4] 8.07-9.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 113 Mbits/sec 24 103 KBytes > [ 4] 9.00-10.06 sec 13.6 MBytes 107 Mbits/sec 98 140 KBytes > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr > [ 4] 0.00-10.06 sec 114 MBytes 95.4 Mbits/sec 418 > sender > [ 4] 0.00-10.06 sec 114 MBytes 95.4 Mbits/sec > receiver > > from SRV to VM : > > [root@centos7 centos]# iperf3 -s -p 5001 > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Server listening on 5001 > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Accepted connection from 200.13.XXX.XXX, port 48782 > [ 5] local 10.0.1.42 port 5001 connected to 200.13.XXX.XXX port 48784 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 7.95 MBytes 66.7 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 10.6 MBytes 88.7 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > [ 5] 10.00-11.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > [ 5] 11.00-11.52 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 5] 0.00-11.52 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec > > sender > > [ 5] 0.00-11.52 sec 18.5 MBytes 13.5 Mbits/sec > receiver > > Regards, > > Olivier > > > > -- > > Andrija Panić > > > > -- Andrija Panić
