(mon français n'est pas si bon) - but if that is a physical server - than
it's a valid test - beside the traffic will go through the VR (from VM via
VR to that external host) - here you have NAT over relatively slow VR
(CPU/RAM) and over the throttled interface most probably.

In general, you should not keep mixed XS versions (whatever is true for
XenServer alone, irrelevant of the CloudStack), as 7.x is a big difference
to 6.5 and i.e. VM live migrations will not work (and I'm sure many other
things, possibly)

That being said, make sure to TEST the upgrade (pool master, then slaves,
then see how to reconnect hosts to ACS, etc, etc) - if this is your test
env - better start from scratch.

 7.1 LTSR is recommended over 7.0 any day.

Cheers
Andrija

On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 22:22, Olivier GUIN <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Andrija,
>
> Thank for your anwser ...
>
> 1) My Cloudstack is 4.13
>
> 2) Can I mix a version of xen 6.5 and xen 7 in the same cluster? (I think
> I cannot move a VM from one cluster to another)
>
> 3) 200.13.xxx.xxx est un de mes serveurs sur mon réseau physique
>
> I think the problem comes from my service offerings
>
> I keep looking ...
>
> But I think upgrading my Xen servers from 6.5 to 7 is a good idea.
>
> Point 2 is important !
>
> Regards,
>
> Olivier
> Le 23/04/2020 à 16:02, Andrija Panic a écrit :
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> Upgrade to 4.13 should not be a problem here. I would suggest:
>
>
> - checking traffic shaping on XenServer side - to confirm what is/is not
> in place (we don't know your network offerings/compute offerings network
> rates and such)
> - Confirm VM/drivers used inside VMs are all up to date (6.5 is an ancient
> thing, not supported any more in ACS 4.14 that will be out soon)
>
>
> You are doing:   iperf3 -c 200.13.XXX.XXX -p5001
>
> Why are you connecting to the IP of the VR? What kind of testing is this
> supposed to be/show what?
>
>
>
> Why not starting iperf server on Centos 7 and connect to it from Windows
> 2012 (and the other way around)?
> This traffic is NOT going over the virtual router, but just via the same
> "network" on XS.
>
> I'll try ok
>
>
> Alternatively, you can deploy VPC (multiple isolated networks behind a VR)
> - and have VM1 in network1, VM2 in network2 - and do iperf between them
> (traffic router via VR) - here keep in mind even if your VM's NIC are
> 1Gbps, but your VR NICs are 100 Mbps, you will be limited to the slowest
> nic in the whole path/chain - 100 Mbps.
>
> OK
>
>
> Regards,
> Andrija
> -
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 20:34, Olivier Guin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Some news :
>>
>> from VM to SRV :
>>
>> [root@centos7 centos]# iperf3 -c 200.13.XXX.XXX -p5001
>> Connecting to host 200.13.XXX.XXX, port 5001
>> [  4] local 10.0.1.42 port 56190 connected to 200.13.XXX.XXX port 5001
>> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
>> [  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  12.9 MBytes   108 Mbits/sec   77   55.1 KBytes
>> [  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  11.9 MBytes   100 Mbits/sec   51   45.2 KBytes
>> [  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  9.96 MBytes  83.6 Mbits/sec   36   28.3 KBytes
>> [  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  9.37 MBytes  78.6 Mbits/sec   33   25.5 KBytes
>> [  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  11.1 MBytes  93.5 Mbits/sec   24   50.9 KBytes
>> [  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  94.2 Mbits/sec   24   82.0 KBytes
>> [  4]   6.00-7.07   sec  12.9 MBytes   101 Mbits/sec   38    143 KBytes
>> [  4]   7.07-8.07   sec  9.03 MBytes  75.2 Mbits/sec   13    123 KBytes
>> [  4]   8.07-9.00   sec  12.5 MBytes   113 Mbits/sec   24    103 KBytes
>> [  4]   9.00-10.06  sec  13.6 MBytes   107 Mbits/sec   98    140 KBytes
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
>> [  4]   0.00-10.06  sec   114 MBytes  95.4 Mbits/sec  418
>> sender
>> [  4]   0.00-10.06  sec   114 MBytes  95.4 Mbits/sec
>> receiver
>>
>> from SRV to VM :
>>
>> [root@centos7 centos]# iperf3 -s -p 5001
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> Server listening on 5001
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> Accepted connection from 200.13.XXX.XXX, port 48782
>> [  5] local 10.0.1.42 port 5001 connected to 200.13.XXX.XXX port 48784
>> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
>> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  7.95 MBytes  66.7 Mbits/sec
>> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  10.6 MBytes  88.7 Mbits/sec
>> [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> [  5]  10.00-11.00  sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> [  5]  11.00-11.52  sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
>> [  5]   0.00-11.52  sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec                  sender
>> [  5]   0.00-11.52  sec  18.5 MBytes  13.5 Mbits/sec
>> receiver
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>
>

-- 

Andrija Panić

Reply via email to