I think that’s the only outstanding item before we cut rc2. Regards, Boris Stoyanov
[email protected] www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 25 Jan 2018, at 14:44, Jean-Francois Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perfect. Thanks Boris. > > Can the fix for shared L2 networks also be merged in 4.11 RC2 ? > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Boris Stoyanov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Jean-Francois, >> We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included >> in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up. >> >> Boris >> >> >> [email protected] >> www.shapeblue.com >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >>> On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s >> an open thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that >> thread with your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release >> management. >>> >>> Bobby. >>> >>> >>> [email protected] >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thank you both Boris and Nux! >>>> >>>> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1. If I may get your attention on another issue >>>> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 >> :-) >>>> >>>> best regards, >>>> >>>> Jean-Francois >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, >>>>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now >>>>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a >>>>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 >>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 >>>>> >>>>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Boris. >>>>> >>>>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we >> are >>>>> doing testing for 4.11. >>>>> >>>>> HTH >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>>>> >>>>> Nux! >>>>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> www.shapeblue.com >>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >>>>> @shapeblue >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "users" <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 >>>>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at >>>>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ >>>>> >>>>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with >> no >>>>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required >> to >>>>> fill some CIDR information. >>>>> >>>>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the >> previous >>>>> approach when required to integrate an existing network. >>>>> >>>>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using >> the L2 >>>>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I >> can't >>>>> make them public. >>>>> >>>>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', <Response [531]>, {u'errorcode': >> 531, >>>>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use >>>>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission >>>>> denied'}) >>>>> >>>>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine.... but really I >> want to >>>>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >>
