Perfect. Thanks Boris. Can the fix for shared L2 networks also be merged in 4.11 RC2 ?
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Boris Stoyanov < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Jean-Francois, > We’ve just confirmed CLOUDSTACK-10239 is a regression and will be included > in 4.11 RC2. Thanks for bringing this up. > > Boris > > > [email protected] > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > On 24 Jan 2018, at 9:57, Boris Stoyanov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Jean-Francois, I don’t know if you’re following dev@ list, there’s > an open thread for voting on release candidates. If you reply to that > thread with your findings it’ll be more visible to devs and release > management. > > > > Bobby. > > > > > > [email protected] > > www.shapeblue.com > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > >> On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:23, Jean-Francois Nadeau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Thank you both Boris and Nux! > >> > >> I'll keep an eye 4.11.1. If I may get your attention on another issue > >> that blocks me from further testing on 4.11, I filled CLOUDSTACK-10239 > :-) > >> > >> best regards, > >> > >> Jean-Francois > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Boris Stoyanov < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks for bringing this up Jean-Francois, > >>> One of our devs has addressed this and with the following PR it’s now > >>> fixed. It turned out a constraint was violated when deploying a VM in a > >>> project. This will likely get merged in 4.11.1.0 > >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2420 > >>> > >>> Please let keep us posted if you find any further issues. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Boris. > >>> > >>> On 19 Jan 2018, at 17:57, Nux! <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Might be worth sending this to dev@ as well, especially now that we > are > >>> doing testing for 4.11. > >>> > >>> HTH > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >>> > >>> Nux! > >>> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> > >>> > >>> > >>> [email protected] > >>> www.shapeblue.com > >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >>> @shapeblue > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <[email protected]> > >>> To: "users" <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 21:09:19 > >>> Subject: New L2 nework types are not shared > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I'm testing 4.11-rc1 and the new L2 network type feature as shown at > >>> http://www.shapeblue.com/layer-2-networks-in-cloudstack/ > >>> > >>> I want to use this as a replacement to a shared network offering with > no > >>> DHCP which works to support an external DHCP server but still required > to > >>> fill some CIDR information. > >>> > >>> I thought the intent was that L2 network type was to replace the > previous > >>> approach when required to integrate an existing network. > >>> > >>> If I attempt to provision a VM in a project as the root admin using > the L2 > >>> network I get denied... apparently because they are not shared and I > can't > >>> make them public. > >>> > >>> ('HTTP 531 response from CloudStack', <Response [531]>, {u'errorcode': > 531, > >>> u'uuidList': [], u'cserrorcode': 4365, u'errortext': u'Unable to use > >>> network with id= 7712102b-bbdf-4c54-bdbf-9fddfa16de46, permission > >>> denied'}) > >>> > >>> Provisioning in the root project works just fine.... but really I > want to > >>> use L2 networks in user projects even if only the admin can do so. > >>> > >>> Thoughts ? > >>> > >>> > > > >
