Nice, glad you got it sorted.

If you have the opportunity it would be very beneficial if you can reproduce 
this issue in a non-critical network and log a Jira ticket.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 30/11/2016, 15:32, "Ezequiel Mc Govern" <[email protected]> wrote:

    The field “redundant” in table cloud.networks is not modified after the 
change of the network offering, i modified manualy  the value of "redundant" to 
false and the problem was resolved :)
    
    
    Thanks!
    
    
    
    > On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:37 PM, Dag Sonstebo <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    > 
    > Hi Ezequiel,
    > 
    > This sounds like a bug, but I have managed to recreate something similar 
in the lab. Can you check the following:
    > 
    > First of all find your network in the network table:
    > 
    > SELECT id,name,network_offering_id,state,guest_type,redundant FROM 
cloud.networks;
    > 
    > The check two things:
    > 1) Check that the network_offering_id is pointed to the correct ID – i.e. 
the one without HA / redundant VR ( you can check this with SELECT * FROM 
cloud.network_offerings;).
    > 2) Check that the “redundant” field comes back as zero – “0”
    > 
    > My suspicion is you have the correct network offering in step 1, but you 
may find the redundant field is set to one  “1” – which would potentially cause 
the problem you are describing.
    > 
    > I managed to recreate the problem by changing the “redundant” field for 
an isolated network from 0 to 1 – at which point another VR was created next 
time I created a VM. I then managed to fix this again by changing the network 
back to a redundant=0 before restarting the network with cleanup. This deleted 
both the running VRs and created a single healthy one.
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Dag Sonstebo
    > Cloud Architect
    > ShapeBlue
    > 
    > On 29/11/2016, 13:40, "Ezequiel Mc Govern" <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    > 
    >    In CS 4.8 and in CS 4.9.0.1, changing the NetworkOffering from one 
with HA to one without HA, the process is performed normally, the redundant VRs 
are eliminated and a new one is created. Connectivity is maintained and 
everything works in a normal way. But creating a new VM in the Domain creates a 
redundant VR, causing connectivity cuts.
    >    Currently we are solving it by performing a manual migration to 
another Network already configured without HA. Is this by design or can it be 
considered as a Bug?
    > 
    >    Thanks !
    > 
    >    In Spanish:
    > 
    >    En CS 4.8 y en CS 4.9.0.1 ,al cambiar el NetworkOffering desde uno con 
HA a uno sin HA, el proceso se efectua normalmente, se eliminan los VR 
redundantes y se crea uno nuevo. La conectividad se mantiene y funciona todo de 
forma normal. Pero al crear una nueva VM en el Domain se vuelve a crear un VR 
redundante provocando cortes en la conectividad.
    >    Actualmente lo estamos solucionando realizando una migración manual a 
otra Network ya configurado sin HA. ¿ Esto es por diseño o se puede considerar 
como un Bug ?
    > 
    >    Gracias!
    > 
    > 
    > [email protected] 
    > www.shapeblue.com
    > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
    > @shapeblue
    > 
    > 
    > 
    
    


[email protected] 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Reply via email to