The field “redundant” in table cloud.networks is not modified after the change 
of the network offering, i modified manualy  the value of "redundant" to false 
and the problem was resolved :)


Thanks!



> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:37 PM, Dag Sonstebo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ezequiel,
> 
> This sounds like a bug, but I have managed to recreate something similar in 
> the lab. Can you check the following:
> 
> First of all find your network in the network table:
> 
> SELECT id,name,network_offering_id,state,guest_type,redundant FROM 
> cloud.networks;
> 
> The check two things:
> 1) Check that the network_offering_id is pointed to the correct ID – i.e. the 
> one without HA / redundant VR ( you can check this with SELECT * FROM 
> cloud.network_offerings;).
> 2) Check that the “redundant” field comes back as zero – “0”
> 
> My suspicion is you have the correct network offering in step 1, but you may 
> find the redundant field is set to one  “1” – which would potentially cause 
> the problem you are describing.
> 
> I managed to recreate the problem by changing the “redundant” field for an 
> isolated network from 0 to 1 – at which point another VR was created next 
> time I created a VM. I then managed to fix this again by changing the network 
> back to a redundant=0 before restarting the network with cleanup. This 
> deleted both the running VRs and created a single healthy one.
> 
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
> 
> On 29/11/2016, 13:40, "Ezequiel Mc Govern" <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>    In CS 4.8 and in CS 4.9.0.1, changing the NetworkOffering from one with HA 
> to one without HA, the process is performed normally, the redundant VRs are 
> eliminated and a new one is created. Connectivity is maintained and 
> everything works in a normal way. But creating a new VM in the Domain creates 
> a redundant VR, causing connectivity cuts.
>    Currently we are solving it by performing a manual migration to another 
> Network already configured without HA. Is this by design or can it be 
> considered as a Bug?
> 
>    Thanks !
> 
>    In Spanish:
> 
>    En CS 4.8 y en CS 4.9.0.1 ,al cambiar el NetworkOffering desde uno con HA 
> a uno sin HA, el proceso se efectua normalmente, se eliminan los VR 
> redundantes y se crea uno nuevo. La conectividad se mantiene y funciona todo 
> de forma normal. Pero al crear una nueva VM en el Domain se vuelve a crear un 
> VR redundante provocando cortes en la conectividad.
>    Actualmente lo estamos solucionando realizando una migración manual a otra 
> Network ya configurado sin HA. ¿ Esto es por diseño o se puede considerar 
> como un Bug ?
> 
>    Gracias!
> 
> 
> [email protected] 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to