I actually did upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2, but had to roll back. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.user/7387
After the roll back, that's when my company moved to a new office and changed networks. In the middle of me trying to get 4.1.1 back up again after the move, I did upgrade to 4.2 (again) to see if I would have more luck this time. So I am actually running on 4.2 now. I still cannot deploy my system VMs however, despite following these instructions: http://cloud.kelceydamage.com/cloudfire/blog/2013/10/08/conquering-the-cloudstack-4-2-dragon-kvm/ I actually performed that procedure several times thinking that perhaps I missed something. The very first time I ran it, I could not umount /mnt because I'm self contained, and my /export/primary storage is mounted there as well. So... I realized that those mounting/umounting steps are merely to gain access to the /export/secondary/Template/tmpl/1/3/ files, which are local to my box. So the second time I performed the procedure, I simply renamed the *.qcow2 file to match what was in my database. mv 83f8aec6-9446-4fe5-bc9e-258d25c9348a.qcow2 5c331a9a-8d48-4e53-b9fa-b5e7655b9175.qcow2 Restarted my entire server (probably overkill, but I'm desperate) but that still didn't fix it. I still cannot start system VMs. I created a clean management-server.log file and found that it now thinks I have 3 orphaned management hosts. 2013-10-29 14:48:41,679 DEBUG [utils.db.ConnectionConcierge] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Registering a database connection for ClusterManagerHeartBeat2 2013-10-29 14:48:41,691 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Add orphan management server msid found in host table to initial clustering notification, orphan msid: 279278805450800 2013-10-29 14:48:41,691 INFO [utils.component.ComponentContext] (main:null) Configuring com.cloud.bridge.service.controller.s3.ServiceProvider_EnhancerByCloudStack_f278348c 2013-10-29 14:48:41,691 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Add orphan management server msid found in host table to initial clustering notification, orphan msid: 279278805451095 2013-10-29 14:48:41,691 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Add orphan management server msid found in host table to initial clustering notification, orphan msid: 279278805451190 2013-10-29 14:48:41,691 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Found 3 inactive management server node based on timestamp 2013-10-29 14:48:41,691 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) management server node msid: 279278805450800, name: null, service ip: orphan, version: null 2013-10-29 14:48:41,691 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) management server node msid: 279278805451095, name: null, service ip: orphan, version: null 2013-10-29 14:48:41,691 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) management server node msid: 279278805451190, name: null, service ip: orphan, version: null 2013-10-29 14:48:41,691 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Trying to connect to orphan 2013-10-29 14:48:41,693 ERROR [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Unexpected exception in cluster heartbeat java.nio.channels.UnresolvedAddressException at sun.nio.ch.Net.checkAddress(Net.java:127) at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:640) at com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.pingManagementNode(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1405) at com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.initPeerScan(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1036) at com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.access$1100(ClusterManagerImpl.java:95) at com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl$4.run(ClusterManagerImpl.java:786) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) 2013-10-29 14:48:41,699 DEBUG [utils.db.ConnectionConcierge] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Registering a database connection for ClusterManagerHeartBeat2 I kept looking through the logs and found this error repeated several times: 2013-10-29 14:49:40,072 INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:null) Insufficient capacity com.cloud.exception.InsufficientAddressCapacityException: Insufficient address capacityScope=interface com.cloud.dc.Pod; id=1 at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.fetchNewPublicIp(NetworkManagerImpl.java:472) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.assignPublicIpAddress(NetworkManagerImpl.java:376) at com.cloud.network.guru.DirectPodBasedNetworkGuru.getIp(DirectPodBasedNetworkGuru.java:186) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.network.guru.DirectPodBasedNetworkGuru.reserve(DirectPodBasedNetworkGuru.java:153) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.prepareNic(NetworkManagerImpl.java:2157) at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.prepare(NetworkManagerImpl.java:2127) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:887) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:578) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:571) at com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.startProxy(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:556) at com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.allocCapacity(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:928) at com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:1672) at com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:157) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:111) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81) at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) I've checked my Zone, Pod, Cluster, Network settings, CIDRs, Management IP Range, Guest IP Range, etc... a ton of times now, and cannot find out where the problem may be. Since the problem began when we moved the self-contained server from one network to another, and now the errors suggest that I do not have enough IPs (and I'm assuming it means I do not have enough public IPs based on the stack trace "at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.fetchNewPublicIp(NetworkManagerImpl.java:472)"), what table(s) do I need to look at and potentially clear out to fix this issue? -Adam Best Regards, Adam Scarcella On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Andrija Panic <[email protected]>wrote: > my bad for secondary storage - there is no maintance mode for that :) > > I was just refering to line: > > host=10.97.38.10 - which is hopefully new IP address :) > > Since you got Server capactity issues, I suggest folowing, as temp > solution: > > Check CPU alocation, RAM alocation, and increase overprovisioning factor at > POD level (at least this is in 4.2, or only in global config as was in > 4.0.0), so if you are running out of CPU/RAM resopurces, you might be able > to fix this this way. > > I had this exact type of problem (SSVM not starting), when upgraded from > 4,0 to 4.2,because of bad SSVM template - I had to download > > http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2(previously > I had very old, which came with Cs 4.0.0) - but if you did not > upgrade your CS, then I suppose this is not the case... > > Best > > > > > > On 29 October 2013 16:42, Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Andrija, > > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > Here is the output of my agent.properties file (which looks correct to > me): > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# cat /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties > > #Storage > > #Tue Oct 29 10:15:49 GMT-05:00 2013 > > guest.network.device=cloudbr0 > > workers=5 > > private.network.device=cloudbr0 > > port=8250 > > resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource > > pod=1 > > zone=1 > > guid=db24e08f-ac6e-3974-b223-274d49af52d0 > > cluster=1 > > public.network.device=cloudbr0 > > local.storage.uuid=296f0404-9658-4269-bc24-64b1247d5e3f > > domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm > > host=10.97.38.10 > > LibvirtComputingResource.id=10 > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# ifconfig cloudbr0 > > cloudbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AC:16:2D:84:D4:24 > > inet addr:10.97.38.10 Bcast:10.97.38.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > > inet6 addr: fe80::ae16:2dff:fe84:d424/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:10216 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:10343 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > RX bytes:1605339 (1.5 MiB) TX bytes:24242332 (23.1 MiB) > > > > > > I have 4.5 TB free on my 5.7 TB RAID so I haven't even come close to the > > "pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold" or > > "pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold" of "0.85" > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# df -kh > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > > /dev/mapper/vg_cloudstackuse-lv_root > > 5.7T 921G 4.5T 17% / > > tmpfs 64G 72K 64G 1% /dev/shm > > /dev/sda1 485M 118M 342M 26% /boot > > 10.97.38.10:/export/primary > > 5.7T 921G 4.5T 17% > > /mnt/910365e6-a298-37b8-904f-2b49198c8286 > > [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# cd /export/ > > [root@cs-east-prod1 export]# ls -l > > total 8 > > drwxrwxrwx. 3 root root 4096 Oct 27 19:18 primary > > drwxrwxrwx. 5 root root 4096 Jul 16 11:27 secondary > > [root@cs-east-prod1 export]# du -sh * > > 238G primary > > 110G secondary > > [root@cs-east-prod1 export]# > > > > I've manually destroyed the SSVM several times and yes CS does attempt to > > create a new one, but the same issue occurs. Regardless of whether I > > destroy the SSVM or if CS does it, it just keeps looping. > > > > I'm not exactly sure how to check if my secondary storage is in > Maintenance > > Mode. I know I can enable Maintenance Mode of my Primary Storage, but how > > to check for the Secondary Storage? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > Adam Scarcella > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Andrija Panic <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > I suppose, you can recheck the network, and also check the AGENT > > > configuration file, make changes > > > there: /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties > > > > > > From logs: > > > > > > InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create > > > > a deployment for VM..... > > > > > > I had this kind of error, when my storage pools were disabled once, and > > > also when I have reached "disable capacity treshold" - my storage pool > > was > > > over 85% full. > > > > > > So check if you secondaru storge is in maintance mode, or similar... > > > > > > Also, destroying SSVM will force CS into making new one... > > > > > > > > > On 29 October 2013 16:09, Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Geoff, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply, I was able to manually mount the secondary > > storage > > > > NFS: > > > > > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]# hostname > > > > cs-east-prod1 > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]# hostname --fqdn > > > > cs-east-prod1.na.tibco.com > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]# > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# mkdir /secondaryStorage > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# mount -t nfs cs-east-prod1:/export/secondary > > > > /secondaryStorage > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# cd / > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 /]# ls -l > > > > total 120 > > > > dr-xr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Oct 23 04:48 bin > > > > dr-xr-xr-x. 5 root root 3072 Oct 22 21:10 boot > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 10 root root 4096 Jun 25 10:23 cgroup > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 19 root root 3960 Oct 29 10:38 dev > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 121 root root 12288 Oct 29 11:07 etc > > > > drwxrwxrwx. 4 root root 4096 Jul 3 20:10 export > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jul 3 19:14 home > > > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Aug 28 15:46 Installers -> > > > > /var/www/html/Installers/ > > > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Jul 5 20:58 ISOs -> > > /var/www/html/ISOs/ > > > > dr-xr-xr-x. 11 root root 4096 Jul 3 19:02 lib > > > > dr-xr-xr-x. 10 root root 12288 Oct 28 03:33 lib64 > > > > drwx------. 2 root root 16384 Jul 3 18:44 lost+found > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Oct 27 12:05 media > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 0 Oct 29 10:08 misc > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 39 root root 4096 Sep 6 12:07 mnt > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 0 Oct 29 10:08 net > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jul 3 19:05 opt > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Oct 27 10:06 primarymount > > > > dr-xr-xr-x. 557 root root 0 Oct 29 10:08 proc > > > > dr-xr-x---. 35 root root 4096 Oct 29 10:09 root > > > > dr-xr-xr-x. 2 root root 12288 Oct 28 03:33 sbin > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Oct 27 10:07 secondarymount > > > > drwxrwxrwx. 5 root root 4096 Jul 16 11:27 secondaryStorage > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 7 root root 0 Oct 29 10:08 selinux > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Sep 23 2011 srv > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 13 root root 0 Oct 29 10:08 sys > > > > drwxrwxrwt. 16 root root 4096 Oct 29 11:07 tmp > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 13 root root 4096 Jul 3 18:55 usr > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 23 root root 4096 Jul 3 19:45 var > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 /]# cd secondaryStorage/ > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]# ls -l > > > > total 12 > > > > drwxrwxrwx. 2 root root 4096 Jul 16 11:27 snapshots > > > > drwxrwxrwx. 3 root root 4096 Jul 16 11:10 template > > > > drwxrwxrwx. 3 root root 4096 Jul 22 09:38 volumes > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]# > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam Scarcella > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Adam, > > > > > > > > > > System VMs looping and failing to create is often caused by the > Host > > > > being > > > > > unable to access Sec Storage. > > > > > > > > > > Do a manual mount of the Sec Storage NFS on the Host to confirm it > > can > > > > > access it. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > Geoff Higginbottom > > > > > > > > > > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Adam [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: 29 October 2013 14:44 > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: Re: How to recover entire self contained CloudStack after > > > major > > > > > network changes? > > > > > > > > > > I exported the db as a *.sql file, did search/replace and that > seemed > > > to > > > > > help a lot, but still not 100% out of the woods. Now I'm hitting > the > > > > issue > > > > > where the System VMs (SecondaryStorageVm & ConsoleProxy) do not > > start. > > > > They > > > > > just keep looping from creation to being expunged. > > > > > > > > > > My Zone is enabled, Pod is enabled, Cluster is enabled, Host is Up, > > > > > Primary Storage is online: > > > > > > > > > > [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# df -kh > > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > > > > > /dev/mapper/vg_cloudstackuse-lv_root > > > > > 5.7T 921G 4.5T 17% / > > > > > tmpfs 64G 72K 64G 1% /dev/shm > > > > > /dev/sda1 485M 118M 342M 26% /boot > > > > > 10.97.38.10:/export/primary > > > > > 5.7T 921G 4.5T 17% > > > > > /mnt/910365e6-a298-37b8-904f-2b49198c8286 > > > > > > > > > > Here is an excerpt from my most recent log: > > > > > > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:23,389 DEBUG > > > > > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > > > > > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status. > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:23,391 DEBUG > > > > > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > > > > > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status. > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:23,441 DEBUG > > > > > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > > > > > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status. > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:23,443 DEBUG > > > > > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > > > > > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status. > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:26,872 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] > > > > > (AgentManager-Handler-5:null) Ping from 10 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:38,509 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] > > > > > (StatsCollector-2:null) VmStatsCollector is running... > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:38,708 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] > > > > > (StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running... > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:38,716 INFO > > > [storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector] > > > > > (StatsCollector-3:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will > be > > > sent > > > > > to LocalHostEndPoint > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:44,969 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] > > > > > (StatsCollector-1:null) HostStatsCollector is running... > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:45,587 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] > > > > > (StatsCollector-1:null) Seq 10-768344083: Received: { Ans: , > MgmtId: > > > > > 86691596708691, via: 10, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer > } } > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,802 DEBUG > > > > > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) > > > Zone > > > > 1 > > > > > is ready to launch secondary storage VM > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,807 INFO > > > > > [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > > > > (secstorage-1:null) > > > > > No running secondary storage vms found in datacenter id=1, starting > > one > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,814 INFO > > > > > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > (secstorage-1:null) > > No > > > > > stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new > > > > secondary > > > > > storage vm > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,817 DEBUG > > > > > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) > > > > Assign > > > > > secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request from > > > data > > > > > center : 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,837 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Found existing network configuration for > offering > > > > > [Network Offering > > [6-Guest-DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService]: > > > > > Ntwk[204|Guest|6] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,837 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Releasing lock for > > > > > Acct[6f5c60f0-ee29-11e2-b62c-ac162d84d424-system] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,842 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Found existing network configuration for > offering > > > > > [Network Offering [3-Control-System-Control-Network]: > > > Ntwk[202|Control|3] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,842 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Releasing lock for > > > > > Acct[6f5c60f0-ee29-11e2-b62c-ac162d84d424-system] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,846 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Found existing network configuration for > offering > > > > > [Network Offering [2-Management-System-Management-Network]: > > > > > Ntwk[201|Management|2] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,847 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Releasing lock for > > > > > Acct[6f5c60f0-ee29-11e2-b62c-ac162d84d424-system] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,851 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Found existing network configuration for > offering > > > > > [Network Offering [4-Storage-System-Storage-Network]: > > > Ntwk[203|Storage|4] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,851 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Releasing lock for > > > > > Acct[6f5c60f0-ee29-11e2-b62c-ac162d84d424-system] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,860 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating entries for VM: > > > > > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,865 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nics for > > > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,866 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nic for vm > > > > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] > > > > > in network Ntwk[204|Guest|6] with requested profile > > > > > NicProfile[0-0-null-null-null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,881 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nic for vm > > > > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] > > > > > in network Ntwk[202|Control|3] with requested profile null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,890 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nic for vm > > > > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] > > > > > in network Ntwk[201|Management|2] with requested profile null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,903 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nic for vm > > > > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] > > > > > in network Ntwk[203|Storage|4] with requested profile null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,915 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating disks for > > > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,922 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Allocation completed for VM: > > > > > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,925 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.alert.SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) received secondary storage vm alert > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,925 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.alert.SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) New secondary storage vm created, zone: > > > > EastProdZone1, > > > > > secStorageVm: s-4930-VM, public IP: null, private IP: null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,942 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Stopped to Starting > > with > > > > > event: StartRequestedvm's original host id: null new host id: null > > host > > > > id > > > > > before state transition: null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,942 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Successfully transitioned to start state for > > > > > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] reservation id = > > > > > 3b2435a0-9e32-4777-a42f-a766a375bc1b > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,944 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Trying to deploy VM, vm has dcId: 1 and podId: > > null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,944 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, > hosts: > > > null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,945 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, > hosts: > > > null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: > > > > > > > com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_d4b92e44@713baeaa > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools > from > > > > dc:1, > > > > > pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram: 268435456 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: > > No > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this > > Zone: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate > capacity, > > > that > > > > > have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this > > > > Zone: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,958 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,958 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 > > > pod:1 > > > > > cluster:1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,962 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 0 > hosts > > > to > > > > > check for allocation: [] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,964 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 0 hosts for > allocation > > > > after > > > > > prioritization: [] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,964 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, > > > Ram=256 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,964 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 0 > > > > > suitable hosts > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,965 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable hosts found > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,965 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable hosts found under this Cluster: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,968 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination > > for > > > > > this VM under any clusters, returning. > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,968 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this > > Zone: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,969 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate > capacity, > > > that > > > > > have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this > > > > Zone: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,973 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters > > > from > > > > > avoid set: [1] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,973 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) No clusters found after removing disabled > > clusters > > > > and > > > > > clusters in avoid list, returning. > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,981 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] > > > > > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped > > with > > > > > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null > > > host > > > > > id before state transition: null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,985 WARN > > > > > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > (secstorage-1:null) > > > > > Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm > > > > > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to > > > create > > > > > a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]Scope=interface > > > > > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:842) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:578) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:571) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:267) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:696) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:123) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50) > > > > > at > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81) > > > > > at > > > > > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72) > > > > > at > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) > > > > > at > > > > java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) > > > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,987 INFO > > > > > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > (secstorage-1:null) > > > > > Unable to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, > > secStorageVm > > > > vm > > > > > Id : > > > > > 4930, will recycle it and start a new one > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,987 INFO > > > > > [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > > > > (secstorage-1:null) > > > > > Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,009 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Zone 1 is ready to launch console proxy > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,009 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Expand console proxy standby capacity for > zone > > > > > EastProdZone1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,012 INFO > > > > [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Found a stopped console proxy, bring it up to > > > > > running pool. proxy vm id : 4271 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,020 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Stopped to Starting > > > with > > > > > event: StartRequestedvm's original host id: null new host id: null > > host > > > > id > > > > > before state transition: null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,020 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Successfully transitioned to start state for > > > > > VM[ConsoleProxy|v-4271-VM] reservation id = > > > > > 11861d83-fc09-4b25-8c07-bcb6ad8e7f54 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,021 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Trying to deploy VM, vm has dcId: 1 and > podId: > > > null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,022 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, > > hosts: > > > > null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,023 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, > > hosts: > > > > null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: > > > > > > > com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_d4b92e44@713baeaa > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools > > from > > > > > dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram: > > > > 1073741824 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already > allocated)?: > > > No > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this > > > Zone: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate > > capacity, > > > > > that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under > > > this > > > > > Zone: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,031 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,031 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: > 1 > > > > pod:1 > > > > > cluster:1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,033 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 0 > > hosts > > > > to > > > > > check for allocation: [] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 0 hosts for > > allocation > > > > > after prioritization: [] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, > > > > > Ram=1024 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning > 0 > > > > > suitable hosts > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable hosts found > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable hosts found under this Cluster: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,036 DEBUG > > > > [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment > Destination > > > for > > > > > this VM under any clusters, returning. > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,036 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this > > > Zone: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,037 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate > > capacity, > > > > > that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under > > > this > > > > > Zone: 1 > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,039 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Removing from the clusterId list these > clusters > > > > from > > > > > avoid set: [1] > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,039 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) No clusters found after removing disabled > > > clusters > > > > > and clusters in avoid list, returning. > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,043 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped > > > with > > > > > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null > > > host > > > > > id before state transition: null > > > > > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,045 WARN > > > > [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] > > > > > (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console proxy > > > > > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to > > > create > > > > > a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-4271-VM]Scope=interface > > > > > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:842) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:578) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:571) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.startProxy(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:556) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.allocCapacity(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:928) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:1672) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:157) > > > > > at > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:111) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81) > > > > > at > > > > > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72) > > > > > at > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) > > > > > at > > > > java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) > > > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What am I missing? How can I get these two system VMs online? > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam Scarcella > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Adam <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It's worth a shot. I've gone through the db manually, and changed > > all > > > > > > the places where I could see the old IPs, but your way is much > more > > > > > efficient. > > > > > > Doing it now and will report back soon. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adam Scarcella > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Andrija Panic < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> one of the crazy tries: > > > > > >> backup your database, search for all IP addresses inside SQL > file, > > > > > >> map old to new IP addresses (old1 --> new1, old2 -->new2...) and > > > then > > > > > >> do search/replace each old one with new one. > > > > > >> This is for netowrking/ip addresses (guest, public,etc), same > for > > > NFS > > > > > >> serves, same for NFS host, etc... > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Not sure if that is going to make you UP again, but... > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On 28 October 2013 22:59, Adam <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Hi All, > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > I know what I'm about to ask may seem like crazy talk, but I > > have > > > a > > > > > >> > situation at work where our CloudStack "box" was moved to > > another > > > > > >> network. > > > > > >> > This single server is a self-contained cloud with everything > on > > > one > > > > > box. > > > > > >> > I'm running CS 4.1.1 on CentOS 6.4 x86_64 with KVM and NFS for > > > > > >> > primary > > > > > >> and > > > > > >> > secondary storage mounts. It's a very basic configuration, but > > my > > > > > >> company > > > > > >> > moved from one town to another, and the IT dept decided to > move > > > our > > > > > >> server > > > > > >> > to a different switch and subnet without asking. So now > > literally > > > > > >> > every single IP address of any importance has been changed. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > I've been trying in vain to get this CS up and running again, > > but > > > > > >> > it > > > > > >> seems > > > > > >> > like everything has changed including the guids, or at least > > that > > > > > >> > seems > > > > > >> to > > > > > >> > be the case since I cannot match up guids from the database to > > > > > >> > guids on > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > primary/secondary NFS. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > I'm sure if each piece were separate and moved one piece at a > > > time, > > > > > >> > it would be fairly straightforward, but since this box is > > > > > >> > self-contained > > > > > >> and > > > > > >> > everything changed at the same time, it is proving to be very > > > > > difficult. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Does anyone have any suggestions for me to attempt to recover > my > > > CS? > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Best Regards, > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Adam Scarcella > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Andrija Panić > > > > > >> -------------------------------------- > > > > > >> http://admintweets.com > > > > > >> -------------------------------------- > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > > > intended > > > > > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any > > views > > > > or > > > > > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not > > > necessarily > > > > > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are > > not > > > > the > > > > > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action > > > based > > > > > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact > the > > > > sender > > > > > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue > Ltd > > > is a > > > > > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India > LLP > > > is > > > > a > > > > > company incorporated in India and is operated under license from > > Shape > > > > Blue > > > > > Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated > in > > > > Brasil > > > > > and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a > > > > > registered trademark. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Andrija Panić > > > -------------------------------------- > > > http://admintweets.com > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrija Panić > -------------------------------------- > http://admintweets.com > -------------------------------------- >
