I suppose, you can recheck the network, and also check the AGENT
configuration file, make changes
there: /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties

>From logs:

InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> a deployment for VM.....

I had this kind of error, when my storage pools were disabled once, and
also when I have reached "disable capacity treshold" - my storage pool was
over 85% full.

So check if you secondaru storge is in maintance mode, or similar...

Also, destroying SSVM will force CS into making new one...


On 29 October 2013 16:09, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Geoff,
>
> Thanks for the reply, I was able to manually mount the secondary storage
> NFS:
>
> [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]# hostname
> cs-east-prod1
> [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]# hostname --fqdn
> cs-east-prod1.na.tibco.com
> [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]#
> [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# mkdir /secondaryStorage
> [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# mount -t nfs cs-east-prod1:/export/secondary
> /secondaryStorage
> [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# cd /
> [root@cs-east-prod1 /]# ls -l
> total 120
> dr-xr-xr-x.   2 root root  4096 Oct 23 04:48 bin
> dr-xr-xr-x.   5 root root  3072 Oct 22 21:10 boot
> drwxr-xr-x.  10 root root  4096 Jun 25 10:23 cgroup
> drwxr-xr-x.  19 root root  3960 Oct 29 10:38 dev
> drwxr-xr-x. 121 root root 12288 Oct 29 11:07 etc
> drwxrwxrwx.   4 root root  4096 Jul  3 20:10 export
> drwxr-xr-x.   3 root root  4096 Jul  3 19:14 home
> lrwxrwxrwx.   1 root root    25 Aug 28 15:46 Installers ->
> /var/www/html/Installers/
> lrwxrwxrwx.   1 root root    19 Jul  5 20:58 ISOs -> /var/www/html/ISOs/
> dr-xr-xr-x.  11 root root  4096 Jul  3 19:02 lib
> dr-xr-xr-x.  10 root root 12288 Oct 28 03:33 lib64
> drwx------.   2 root root 16384 Jul  3 18:44 lost+found
> drwxr-xr-x.   3 root root  4096 Oct 27 12:05 media
> drwxr-xr-x.   2 root root     0 Oct 29 10:08 misc
> drwxr-xr-x.  39 root root  4096 Sep  6 12:07 mnt
> drwxr-xr-x.   2 root root     0 Oct 29 10:08 net
> drwxr-xr-x.   3 root root  4096 Jul  3 19:05 opt
> drwxr-xr-x.   2 root root  4096 Oct 27 10:06 primarymount
> dr-xr-xr-x. 557 root root     0 Oct 29 10:08 proc
> dr-xr-x---.  35 root root  4096 Oct 29 10:09 root
> dr-xr-xr-x.   2 root root 12288 Oct 28 03:33 sbin
> drwxr-xr-x.   2 root root  4096 Oct 27 10:07 secondarymount
> drwxrwxrwx.   5 root root  4096 Jul 16 11:27 secondaryStorage
> drwxr-xr-x.   7 root root     0 Oct 29 10:08 selinux
> drwxr-xr-x.   2 root root  4096 Sep 23  2011 srv
> drwxr-xr-x.  13 root root     0 Oct 29 10:08 sys
> drwxrwxrwt.  16 root root  4096 Oct 29 11:07 tmp
> drwxr-xr-x.  13 root root  4096 Jul  3 18:55 usr
> drwxr-xr-x.  23 root root  4096 Jul  3 19:45 var
> [root@cs-east-prod1 /]# cd secondaryStorage/
> [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]# ls -l
> total 12
> drwxrwxrwx. 2 root root 4096 Jul 16 11:27 snapshots
> drwxrwxrwx. 3 root root 4096 Jul 16 11:10 template
> drwxrwxrwx. 3 root root 4096 Jul 22 09:38 volumes
> [root@cs-east-prod1 secondaryStorage]#
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Adam Scarcella
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Adam,
> >
> > System VMs looping and failing to create is often caused by the Host
> being
> > unable to access Sec Storage.
> >
> > Do a manual mount of the Sec Storage NFS on the Host to confirm it can
> > access it.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> >
> > [email protected]
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 29 October 2013 14:44
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: How to recover entire self contained CloudStack after major
> > network changes?
> >
> > I exported the db as a *.sql file, did search/replace and that seemed to
> > help a lot, but still not 100% out of the woods. Now I'm hitting the
> issue
> > where the System VMs (SecondaryStorageVm & ConsoleProxy) do not start.
> They
> > just keep looping from creation to being expunged.
> >
> > My Zone is enabled, Pod is enabled, Cluster is enabled, Host is Up,
> > Primary Storage is online:
> >
> > [root@cs-east-prod1 ~]# df -kh
> > Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/mapper/vg_cloudstackuse-lv_root
> >                       5.7T  921G  4.5T  17% /
> > tmpfs                  64G   72K   64G   1% /dev/shm
> > /dev/sda1             485M  118M  342M  26% /boot
> > 10.97.38.10:/export/primary
> >                       5.7T  921G  4.5T  17%
> > /mnt/910365e6-a298-37b8-904f-2b49198c8286
> >
> > Here is an excerpt from my most recent log:
> >
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:23,389 DEBUG
> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status.
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:23,391 DEBUG
> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status.
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:23,441 DEBUG
> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers to update status.
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:23,443 DEBUG
> > [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 networks to update RvR status.
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:26,872 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
> > (AgentManager-Handler-5:null) Ping from 10
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:38,509 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> > (StatsCollector-2:null) VmStatsCollector is running...
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:38,708 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> > (StatsCollector-3:null) StorageCollector is running...
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:38,716 INFO  [storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector]
> > (StatsCollector-3:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent
> > to LocalHostEndPoint
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:44,969 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
> > (StatsCollector-1:null) HostStatsCollector is running...
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:45,587 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> > (StatsCollector-1:null) Seq 10-768344083: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId:
> > 86691596708691, via: 10, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } }
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,802 DEBUG
> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone
> 1
> > is ready to launch secondary storage VM
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,807 INFO
> >  [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:null)
> > No running secondary storage vms found in datacenter id=1, starting one
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,814 INFO
> >  [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) No
> > stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
> secondary
> > storage vm
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,817 DEBUG
> > [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Assign
> > secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request from data
> > center : 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,837 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Found existing network configuration for offering
> > [Network Offering [6-Guest-DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService]:
> > Ntwk[204|Guest|6]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,837 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Releasing lock for
> > Acct[6f5c60f0-ee29-11e2-b62c-ac162d84d424-system]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,842 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Found existing network configuration for offering
> > [Network Offering [3-Control-System-Control-Network]: Ntwk[202|Control|3]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,842 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Releasing lock for
> > Acct[6f5c60f0-ee29-11e2-b62c-ac162d84d424-system]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,846 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Found existing network configuration for offering
> > [Network Offering [2-Management-System-Management-Network]:
> > Ntwk[201|Management|2]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,847 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Releasing lock for
> > Acct[6f5c60f0-ee29-11e2-b62c-ac162d84d424-system]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,851 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Found existing network configuration for offering
> > [Network Offering [4-Storage-System-Storage-Network]: Ntwk[203|Storage|4]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,851 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Releasing lock for
> > Acct[6f5c60f0-ee29-11e2-b62c-ac162d84d424-system]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,860 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating entries for VM:
> > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,865 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nics for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,866 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nic for vm
> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]
> > in network Ntwk[204|Guest|6] with requested profile
> > NicProfile[0-0-null-null-null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,881 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nic for vm
> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]
> > in network Ntwk[202|Control|3] with requested profile null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,890 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nic for vm
> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]
> > in network Ntwk[201|Management|2] with requested profile null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,903 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating nic for vm
> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]
> > in network Ntwk[203|Storage|4] with requested profile null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,915 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Allocating disks for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,922 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Allocation completed for VM:
> > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,925 DEBUG
> [cloud.alert.SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter]
> > (secstorage-1:null) received secondary storage vm alert
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,925 DEBUG
> [cloud.alert.SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter]
> > (secstorage-1:null) New secondary storage vm created, zone:
> EastProdZone1,
> > secStorageVm: s-4930-VM, public IP: null, private IP: null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,942 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Stopped to Starting with
> > event: StartRequestedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
> id
> > before state transition: null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,942 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Successfully transitioned to start state for
> > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM] reservation id =
> > 3b2435a0-9e32-4777-a42f-a766a375bc1b
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,944 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Trying to deploy VM, vm has dcId: 1 and podId: null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,944 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, hosts: null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,945 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, hosts: null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm:
> > com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_d4b92e44@713baeaa
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from
> dc:1,
> > pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram: 268435456
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,946 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that
> > have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this
> Zone: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,958 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,958 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1  pod:1
> >  cluster:1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,962 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 0 hosts to
> > check for allocation: []
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,964 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 0 hosts for allocation
> after
> > prioritization: []
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,964 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=256
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,964 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 0
> > suitable hosts
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,965 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable hosts found
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,965 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No suitable hosts found under this Cluster: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,968 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
> > this VM under any clusters, returning.
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,968 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,969 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that
> > have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this
> Zone: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,973 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from
> > avoid set: [1]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,973 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (secstorage-1:null) No clusters found after removing disabled clusters
> and
> > clusters in avoid list, returning.
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,981 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (secstorage-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
> > id before state transition: null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,985 WARN
> >  [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> > Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
> > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> > a deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-4930-VM]Scope=interface
> > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:842)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:578)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:571)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:267)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:696)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:123)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
> >         at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104)
> >         at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
> >         at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81)
> >         at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
> >         at
> > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> >         at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304)
> >         at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178)
> >         at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
> >         at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> >         at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> >         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,987 INFO
> >  [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> > Unable to start secondary storage vm for standby capacity, secStorageVm
> vm
> > Id :
> > 4930, will recycle it and start a new one
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:51,987 INFO
> >  [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:null)
> > Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait until next turn
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,009 DEBUG
> [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Zone 1 is ready to launch console proxy
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,009 DEBUG
> [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Expand console proxy standby capacity for zone
> > EastProdZone1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,012 INFO
>  [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Found a stopped console proxy, bring it up to
> > running pool. proxy vm id : 4271
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,020 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Stopped to Starting with
> > event: StartRequestedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
> id
> > before state transition: null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,020 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Successfully transitioned to start state for
> > VM[ConsoleProxy|v-4271-VM] reservation id =
> > 11861d83-fc09-4b25-8c07-bcb6ad8e7f54
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,021 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Trying to deploy VM, vm has dcId: 1 and podId: null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,022 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, hosts:
> null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,023 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, hosts:
> null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm:
> > com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_d4b92e44@713baeaa
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from
> > dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram:
> 1073741824
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,024 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity,
> > that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this
> > Zone: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,031 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,031 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1
>  pod:1
> >  cluster:1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,033 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 0 hosts
> to
> > check for allocation: []
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 0 hosts for allocation
> > after prioritization: []
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz,
> > Ram=1024
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
> > (consoleproxy-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 0
> > suitable hosts
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable hosts found
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,034 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) No suitable hosts found under this Cluster: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,036 DEBUG
> [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for
> > this VM under any clusters, returning.
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,036 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,037 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity,
> > that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this
> > Zone: 1
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,039 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters
> from
> > avoid set: [1]
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,039 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) No clusters found after removing disabled clusters
> > and clusters in avoid list, returning.
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,043 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with
> > event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host
> > id before state transition: null
> > 2013-10-29 09:22:52,045 WARN
>  [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> > (consoleproxy-1:null) Exception while trying to start console proxy
> > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create
> > a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-4271-VM]Scope=interface
> > com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:842)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:578)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:571)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.startProxy(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:556)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.allocCapacity(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:928)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:1672)
> >         at
> >
> >
> com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java:157)
> >         at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:111)
> >         at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
> >         at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81)
> >         at
> > com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
> >         at
> > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> >         at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304)
> >         at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178)
> >         at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
> >         at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> >         at
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> >         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
> >
> >
> > What am I missing? How can I get these two system VMs online?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Adam Scarcella
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > It's worth a shot. I've gone through the db manually, and changed all
> > > the places where I could see the old IPs, but your way is much more
> > efficient.
> > > Doing it now and will report back soon. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Adam Scarcella
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Andrija Panic <
> [email protected]
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> one of the crazy tries:
> > >> backup your database, search for all IP addresses inside SQL file,
> > >> map old to new IP addresses (old1 --> new1, old2 -->new2...) and then
> > >> do search/replace each old one with new one.
> > >> This is for netowrking/ip addresses (guest, public,etc), same for NFS
> > >> serves, same for NFS host, etc...
> > >>
> > >> Not sure if that is going to make you UP again, but...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 28 October 2013 22:59, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi All,
> > >> >
> > >> > I know what I'm about to ask may seem like crazy talk, but I have a
> > >> > situation at work where our CloudStack "box" was moved to another
> > >> network.
> > >> > This single server is a self-contained cloud with everything on one
> > box.
> > >> > I'm running CS 4.1.1 on CentOS 6.4 x86_64 with KVM and NFS for
> > >> > primary
> > >> and
> > >> > secondary storage mounts. It's a very basic configuration, but my
> > >> company
> > >> > moved from one town to another, and the IT dept decided to move our
> > >> server
> > >> > to a different switch and subnet without asking. So now literally
> > >> > every single IP address of any importance has been changed.
> > >> >
> > >> > I've been trying in vain to get this CS up and running again, but
> > >> > it
> > >> seems
> > >> > like everything has changed including the guids, or at least that
> > >> > seems
> > >> to
> > >> > be the case since I cannot match up guids from the database to
> > >> > guids on
> > >> the
> > >> > primary/secondary NFS.
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm sure if each piece were separate and moved one piece at a time,
> > >> > it would be fairly straightforward, but since this box is
> > >> > self-contained
> > >> and
> > >> > everything changed at the same time, it is proving to be very
> > difficult.
> > >> >
> > >> > Does anyone have any suggestions for me to attempt to recover my CS?
> > >> >
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Adam Scarcella
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Andrija Panić
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >>   http://admintweets.com
> > >> --------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
> or
> > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
> the
> > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> sender
> > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is
> a
> > company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue
> > Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil
> > and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
> > registered trademark.
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić
--------------------------------------
  http://admintweets.com
--------------------------------------

Reply via email to