That's it.

Justin

On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 2:19 PM William Crowell
<wcrow...@perforce.com.invalid> wrote:

> Justin,
>
> Never, I think I found it:
>
> “…the web console's behavior is configurable. Go to the "Preferences"
> (available from the menu in the top right) and click the "Jolokia" tab.
> Here you can turn off auto-refresh (i.e. "Update rate"). You can also
> decrease the amount of data fetched by lowering the "Max depth" and "Max
> collection size."
>
> Regards,
>
> William Crowell
>
> From: William Crowell <wcrow...@perforce.com.INVALID>
> Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 3:12 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Maximum Amount of Topic/Queues Within Apache Artemis
> Justin,
>
> Appreciate your reply.  Your insight is greatly appreciated and invaluable.
>
> If you can provide more details on this, then I would appreciate it.  I
> can search the archives for it as well.  I am guessing there is some
> command line equivalent to represent the tree.
>
> What we have is several devices that have JMS clients that communicate
> with the broker on topics and durable queues.  By “several devices” I mean
> maybe 100s or 1000s.
>
> Regards,
>
> William Crowell
>
> From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org>
> Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 2:57 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Maximum Amount of Topic/Queues Within Apache Artemis
> The broker itself doesn't impose any arbitrary limits on the number of
> addresses & queues. That said, there certainly are limits, the size of your
> heap probably being the most important. Every address and queue carry with
> it some memory overhead including the objects themselves but also related
> objects like JMX MBeans which enable management.
>
> The current management console will struggle by default with a huge number
> of addresses and/or queues due to the way the "tree" view works (i.e.
> refreshing the whole view on a regular basis). This is the main reason we
> removed this view in the new console [1]. That said, the console can be
> configured in such a way as to mitigate some of these problems. I can
> provide more details on that if necessary although it's been covered on
> this list a few times already.
>
> Regarding scalability...the broker was written with scalability in mind,
> but everything breaks down at some point. I'm interested to hear about your
> experiences if you go down this route especially regarding bottlenecks that
> you may find for your specific use-case. Keep us in the loop!
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1]
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FARTEMIS-5319&data=05%7C02%7CWCrowell%40perforce.com%7C74d6a8cd75564168b04208dd5c2215f8%7C95b666d19a7549ab95a38969fbcdc08c%7C0%7C0%7C638768023660185257%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=E7TswZkcxZly0xeJaT%2BxvjP99WWR4kLOIu38ZKDMmEA%3D&reserved=0
> <
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FARTEMIS-5319&data=05%7C02%7CWCrowell%40perforce.com%7C74d6a8cd75564168b04208dd5c2215f8%7C95b666d19a7549ab95a38969fbcdc08c%7C0%7C0%7C638768023660204846%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qu%2BdpyKzTU%2F3ID8bj%2BD548FZoOAF2flj48msrN0PzfI%3D&reserved=0
> ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5319>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 12:33 PM William Crowell
> <wcrow...@perforce.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > Are there any limitations or concerns with creating millions of topics
> and
> > queues within Apache Artemis that have low volumes of messages in each
> > topic and queue?  I do not think there are as I believe Artemis should be
> > able to handle this use case.  Important question is: Is it scalable?
> >
> > Regards and have a great day,
> >
> > William Crowell
> >
> >
> > This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> If
> > you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> > attachments and notify us immediately.
> >
> >
>
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
> This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us immediately.
>
>
> This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us immediately.
>
>

Reply via email to