Can you be more specific? Off the top of my head I'm not sure if this is
expected or not. It might be that the name is based on the IDs of the
source and target. I need more details in order to investigate.


Justin

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:11 AM William Crowell
<wcrow...@perforce.com.invalid> wrote:

> Good morning,
>
> Does anyone have an idea why the name of cluster in certain bindings is a
> concatenation of two cluster ids?  I keep seeing this in the logs.
>
> Regards,
>
> William Crowell
>
>
> This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us immediately.
>
>

Reply via email to