> On Oct 19, 2022, at 11:04 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> The confirmation window size is definitely a change that needs to be done.
>
> Is your benchmark a single producer / consumer ?
The benchmark program can be configured with many consumers and producers of
many topics.
You can see some of the extreme tests that some are doing from the workloads
here: https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/tree/master/workloads
Thanks,
Dave
>
>
> There is a lot of things we do to allow scale of multiple clients.
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 4:08 PM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> There is a project at the Linux Foundation called
>> https://openmessaging.cloud - they include Artemis drivers in their
>> Benchmark program - for both Artemis here:
>> https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/tree/master/driver-artemis and
>> Artemis JMS here:
>> https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/tree/master/driver-jms
>>
>> We had someone doing benchmarks using the Artemis JMS driver and on a
>> cross country test with about 60 ms of internet latency the results are not
>> good.
>>
>> We wanted to get feedback from the ActiveMQ project about a PR we are
>> submitting: https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/pull/343
>>
>> Are there additional changes that should be made to optimize Artemis?
>>
>> Also if there are any JMS configurations that could improve throughput
>> that can be made when running Artemis JMS any pointers would be helpful.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> --
> Clebert Suconic
