Franz worked with the software mills guys. There is a blog post about it I think with some recommendations.
I will see if I can find some links in the morning to add here. On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 2:04 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > The confirmation window size is definitely a change that needs to be done. > > Is your benchmark a single producer / consumer ? > > > There is a lot of things we do to allow scale of multiple clients. > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 4:08 PM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > >> There is a project at the Linux Foundation called >> https://openmessaging.cloud - they include Artemis drivers in their >> Benchmark program - for both Artemis here: >> https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/tree/master/driver-artemis >> and Artemis JMS here: >> https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/tree/master/driver-jms >> >> We had someone doing benchmarks using the Artemis JMS driver and on a >> cross country test with about 60 ms of internet latency the results are not >> good. >> >> We wanted to get feedback from the ActiveMQ project about a PR we are >> submitting: https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/pull/343 >> >> Are there additional changes that should be made to optimize Artemis? >> >> Also if there are any JMS configurations that could improve throughput >> that can be made when running Artemis JMS any pointers would be helpful. >> >> Best Regards, >> Dave >> >> >> -- > Clebert Suconic > -- Clebert Suconic
