Yeah.. something like that... not necessarily in there though. but a similar test.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 1:44 PM Stephen Baker <stephen.ba...@rmssoftwareinc.com> wrote: > > Ok, I agree based on a cursory reading of that patch. The extra ackReason > defaults to normal in one direction and isn’t read in the other direction. > Killed, replaced, and expired being interpreted as normal just means that the > 2.20 bugs will persist until both sides are updated. > > I’ll test it out with different version docker containers. I suppose as far > as writing tests you mean something like the MultiVersionReplicaTest. > > Stephen E. Baker > > > From: Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 12:59 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Mirror compatibility across versions > In theory it should work. > > > Only change that might break compatibility is > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/68f6d8263d8c795722805f0e4d6939e7a8b9ed48 > which is ARTEMIS-3743 / ARTEMIS-3766 Use ACKReason on Mirror to > determine target operations and fixing Delivering statistics on Mirror > > > I tried to not break compatibility, but I just realized we should add > a test to validate compatibility between mirrors. > > > > so, I will say it should be compatible, but I would test it before > doing it in the real system. > > > > if you are willing to contribute to a compatibility test :) > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:06 AM Stephen Baker > <stephen.ba...@rmssoftwareinc.com> wrote: > > > > We are planning our production upgrade from 2.20 to 2.25. These upgrades > > involve a loss of service in the window between stopping the live and when > > the backup instance becomes ready to process messages. > > > > I was wondering if the mirror protocol is expected to be compatible between > > those versions. If so we could upgrade our cold site, and then wait for a > > planned failover to avoid any additional down time. I know that quite a bit > > of work was done by Clebert in 2.24 so I was hoping he could weigh in. > > > > Stephen E Baker > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > [EXTERNAL]: This email originated from outside of Rave Mobile Safety. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. -- Clebert Suconic
