Hello Vince- Are you able to detail out the use case and rationale for separating the data store from the locker? On the surface that sounds like creating an extra runtime coupling with a distributed system— generally that approach creates more aggregate downtime.
Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On May 24, 2021, at 3:42 PM, Vince Cox <v...@perforce.com> wrote: > > Are there any future plans with ActiveMQ that will provide separate data > source (using JDBC) to handle leader activity and message traffic? We are > aware we can use kahaDB and JDBC, but we’d like to have a separate JDBC > sources for our message store and our lock. > > Thank you. > > Vince > > > This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If > you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any > attachments and notify us immediately. >
