You would use masterslave for connections to a master/slave cluster from another broker. So if broker C was connecting to the master/slave pair A/B, then C would use a masterslave networkConnector to A/B. But A and B would have no networkConnector to each other, and no masterslave networkConnectors.
Your description of the consumer behavior sounds like the consumer isn't failing over, rather than that the messages are being lost. Can you try to confirm that theory via a JMX viewer such as JConsole? Tim On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, 9:35 AM PedroRP <pedro.rami...@techonrails.com wrote: > Hi Tim! > > Ok, so for a HA ActiveMQ master-slave is not required any network of > brokers, isn't it? > For the messages we are losing. We see that all messages are sent but when > failover happens consumer stops listening messages. Does It makes sense > with > a wrong configuration? > > Thanks for your answer! > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html >
