I've never run the broker in that mode, but I'd expect that one major determiner of your throughput would be the speed at which the disk can do the frequent, small flushes to disk. I'd expect you to see the best performance on a locally-attached SSD with low write latency, but it's possible that you might get similar or better performance in certain configurations involving fast storage arrays, so YMMV.
Also, reducing network latency between the producer and the broker could show a significant improvement if what you have now isn't performant, so you could pursue that. Tim On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 2:03 AM PedroRP <pedro.rami...@techonrails.com wrote: > Hi Tim! > > Thank you very much for your answer! > > Yes, I was using non-durable subscription on my topic. When I changed to > durable subscription, It didn't lose messages if I use sync sends. The main > problem now is the sending response time. It spends too much time sending > messages. Is there any way to accelerate it without async sends? > > Thanks in advance. > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html >
